| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
This reverts commit a33fea08 (fsck: warn about symlink pointing
inside a gitdir, 2024-04-10), which warns against symbolic links
commonly created by git-annex.
|
|
Now that during a `git clone`, the hooks' contents are no longer
compared to the templates' files', the caller for which the
`do_files_match()` function was introduced is gone, and therefore this
function can be retired, too.
This reverts commit 584de0b4c23 (Add a helper function to compare file
contents, 2024-03-30).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
As part of the security bug-fix releases v2.39.4, ..., v2.45.1, I
introduced logic to safeguard `git clone` from running hooks that were
installed _during_ the clone operation.
The rationale was that Git's CVE-2024-32002, CVE-2021-21300,
CVE-2019-1354, CVE-2019-1353, CVE-2019-1352, and CVE-2019-1349 should
have been low-severity vulnerabilities but were elevated to
critical/high severity by the attack vector that allows a weakness where
files inside `.git/` can be inadvertently written during a `git clone`
to escalate to a Remote Code Execution attack by virtue of installing a
malicious `post-checkout` hook that Git will then run at the end of the
operation without giving the user a chance to see what code is executed.
Unfortunately, Git LFS uses a similar strategy to install its own
`post-checkout` hook during a `git clone`; In fact, Git LFS is
installing four separate hooks while running the `smudge` filter.
While this pattern is probably in want of being improved by introducing
better support in Git for Git LFS and other tools wishing to register
hooks to be run at various stages of Git's commands, let's undo the
clone protections to unbreak Git LFS-enabled clones.
This reverts commit 8db1e8743c0 (clone: prevent hooks from running
during a clone, 2024-03-28).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
As part of the protections added in Git v2.45.1 and friends,
repository-local `core.hooksPath` settings are no longer allowed, as a
defense-in-depth mechanism to prevent future Git vulnerabilities to
raise to critical level if those vulnerabilities inadvertently allow the
repository-local config to be written.
What the added protection did not anticipate is that such a
repository-local `core.hooksPath` can not only be used to point to
maliciously-placed scripts in the current worktree, but also to
_prevent_ hooks from being called altogether.
We just reverted the `core.hooksPath` protections, based on the Git
maintainer's recommendation in
https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqq4jaxvm8z.fsf@gitster.g/ to address this
concern as well as related ones. Let's make sure that we won't regress
while trying to protect the clone operation further.
Reported-by: Brooke Kuhlmann <brooke@alchemists.io>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
This defense-in-depth was intended to protect the clone operation
against future escalations where bugs in `git clone` would allow
attackers to write arbitrary files in the `.git/` directory would allow
for Remote Code Execution attacks via maliciously-placed hooks.
However, it turns out that the `core.hooksPath` protection has
unintentional side effects so severe that they do not justify the
benefit of the protections. For example, it has been reported in
https://lore.kernel.org/git/FAFA34CB-9732-4A0A-87FB-BDB272E6AEE8@alchemists.io/
that the following invocation, which is intended to make `git clone`
safer, is itself broken by that protective measure:
git clone --config core.hooksPath=/dev/null <url>
Since it turns out that the benefit does not justify the cost, let's revert
20f3588efc6 (core.hooksPath: add some protection while cloning,
2024-03-30).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
In df93e407f06 (init: refactor the template directory discovery into its
own function, 2024-03-29), I refactored the way the templates directory
is discovered.
The refactoring was faithful, but missed a reference in the `Makefile`
where the `DEFAULT_GIT_TEMPLATE_DIR` constant is defined. As a
consequence, Git v2.45.1 and friends will always use the hard-coded path
`/usr/share/git-core/templates`.
Let's fix that by defining the `DEFAULT_GIT_TEMPLATE_DIR` when building
`setup.o`, where that constant is actually used.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
In 8db1e8743c0 (clone: prevent hooks from running during a clone,
2024-03-28), I introduced an inadvertent memory leak that was
unfortunately not caught before v2.45.1 was released. Here is a fix.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Our osx-gcc job explicitly asks to install gcc-13. But since the GitHub
runner image already comes with gcc-13 installed, this is mostly doing
nothing (or in some cases it may install an incremental update over the
runner image). But worse, it recently started causing errors like:
==> Fetching gcc@13
==> Downloading https://ghcr.io/v2/homebrew/core/gcc/13/blobs/sha256:fb2403d97e2ce67eb441b54557cfb61980830f3ba26d4c5a1fe5ecd0c9730d1a
==> Pouring gcc@13--13.2.0.ventura.bottle.tar.gz
Error: The `brew link` step did not complete successfully
The formula built, but is not symlinked into /usr/local
Could not symlink bin/c++-13
Target /usr/local/bin/c++-13
is a symlink belonging to gcc. You can unlink it:
brew unlink gcc
which cause the whole CI job to bail.
I didn't track down the root cause, but I suspect it may be related to
homebrew recently switching the "gcc" default to gcc-14. And it may even
be fixed when a new runner image is released. But if we don't need to
run brew at all, it's one less thing for us to worry about.
[jc: cherry-picked from v2.45.0-3-g7df2405b38]
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
On macOS, a bare "gcc" (without a version) will invoke a wrapper for
clang, not actual gcc. Even when gcc is installed via homebrew, that
only provides version-specific links in /usr/local/bin (like "gcc-13"),
and never a version-agnostic "gcc" wrapper.
As far as I can tell, this has been the case for a long time, and this
osx-gcc job has largely been doing nothing. We can point it at "gcc-13",
which will pick up the homebrew-installed version.
The fix here is specific to the github workflow file, as the gitlab one
does not have a matching job.
It's a little unfortunate that we cannot just ask for the latest version
of gcc which homebrew provides, but as far as I can tell there is no
easy alias (you'd have to find the highest number gcc-* in
/usr/local/bin yourself).
[jc: cherry-picked from v2.45.0-2-g11c7001e3d]
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The last user of this variable went away in 4a6e4b9602 (CI: remove
Travis CI support, 2021-11-23), so it's doing nothing except making it
more confusing to find out which packages _are_ installed.
[jc: cherry-picked from v2.45.0-1-g9d4453e8d6]
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Every time git-send-email calls its ask() function to prompt the user,
we call term(), which instantiates a new Term::ReadLine object. But in
v1.46 of Term::ReadLine::Gnu (which provides the Term::ReadLine
interface on some platforms), its constructor refuses to create a second
instance[1]. So on systems with that version of the module, most
git-send-email instances will fail (as we usually prompt for both "to"
and "in-reply-to" unless the user provided them on the command line).
We can fix this by keeping a single instance variable and returning it
for each call to term(). In perl 5.10 and up, we could do that with a
"state" variable. But since we only require 5.008, we'll do it the
old-fashioned way, with a lexical "my" in its own scope.
Note that the tests in t9001 detect this problem as-is, since the
failure mode is for the program to die. But let's also beef up the
"Prompting works" test to check that it correctly handles multiple
inputs (if we had chosen to keep our FakeTerm hack in the previous
commit, then the failure mode would be incorrectly ignoring prompts
after the first).
[1] For discussion of why multiple instances are forbidden, see:
https://github.com/hirooih/perl-trg/issues/16
[jc: cherry-picked from v2.42.0-rc2~6^2]
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Acked-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Back in 280242d1cc (send-email: do not barf when Term::ReadLine does not
like your terminal, 2006-07-02), we added a fallback for when
Term::ReadLine's constructor failed: we'd have a FakeTerm object
instead, which would then die if anybody actually tried to call
readline() on it. Since we instantiated the $term variable at program
startup, we needed this workaround to let the program run in modes when
we did not prompt the user.
But later, in f4dc9432fd (send-email: lazily load modules for a big
speedup, 2021-05-28), we started loading Term::ReadLine lazily only when
ask() is called. So at that point we know we're trying to prompt the
user, and we can just die if ReadLine instantiation fails, rather than
making this fake object to lazily delay showing the error.
This should be OK even if there is no tty (e.g., we're in a cron job),
because Term::ReadLine will return a stub object in that case whose "IN"
and "OUT" functions return undef. And since 5906f54e47 (send-email:
don't attempt to prompt if tty is closed, 2009-03-31), we check for that
case and skip prompting.
And we can be sure that FakeTerm was not kicking in for such a
situation, because it has actually been broken since that commit! It
does not define "IN" or "OUT" methods, so perl would barf with an error.
If FakeTerm was in use, we were neither honoring what 5906f54e47 tried
to do, nor producing the readable message that 280242d1cc intended.
So we're better off just dropping FakeTerm entirely, and letting the
error reported by constructing Term::ReadLine through.
[jc: cherry-picked from v2.42.0-rc2~6^2~1]
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Acked-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Emir SARI <emir_sari@icloud.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Teng Long <dyroneteng@gmail.com>
|
|
Co-Authored-By: Lumynous <lumynou5.tw@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Kisaragi Hiu <mail@kisaragi-hiu.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi-Jyun Pan <pan93412@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Vũ Tiến Hưng <newcomerminecraft@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com>
|
|
Co-authored-by: Kate Golovanova <kate@kgthreads.com>
Signed-off-by: Arkadii Yakovets <ark@cho.red>
Signed-off-by: Kate Golovanova <kate@kgthreads.com>
|
|
Also fix some inconsistencies, and fix issue reported by
Anders Jonsson <anders.jonsson@norsjovallen.se>.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krefting <peter@softwolves.pp.se>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Matthias Rüster <matthias.ruester@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
|
|
Translate following new components:
* refs/reftable-backend.c
Update following components:
* branch.c
* builtin/column.c
* builtin/config.c
* builtin/for-each-ref.c
* builtin/pack-refs.c
* revision.c
Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Plug a leak we have since 5a76aff1a6 (add: convert to use
parse_pathspec, 2013-07-14).
This leak can be triggered with:
$ git add -p anything
Fixing this leak allows us to mark as leak-free the following tests:
+ t3701-add-interactive.sh
+ t7514-commit-patch.sh
Mark them with "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" to notice and fix
promply any new leak that may be introduced and triggered by them in the
future.
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Plug a leak we have since d6cf873340 (built-in add -p: implement the '/'
("search regex") command, 2019-12-13).
This leak can be triggered with:
$ printf "A\n\nB\n" >file
$ git add file && git commit -m file
$ printf "AA\n\nBB\n" >file
$ printf "s\n/ .\n" >lines
$ git add -p <lines
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Plug a leak we have since ab1e1cccaf (built-in add -i: re-implement
`add-untracked` in C, 2019-11-29).
This leak can be triggered with:
$ echo a | git add -i
As a curiosity, we have a somewhat similar function in builtin/stash.c,
which correctly frees the memory.
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
We have an execution path in apply_data that leaks the local struct
image. Plug it.
This leak can be triggered with:
$ echo foo >file
$ git add file && git commit -m file
$ echo bar >file
$ git diff file >diff
$ sed s/foo/frotz/ <diff >baddiff
$ git apply --cached <baddiff
Fixing this leak allows us to mark as leak-free the following tests:
+ t2016-checkout-patch.sh
+ t4103-apply-binary.sh
+ t4104-apply-boundary.sh
+ t4113-apply-ending.sh
+ t4117-apply-reject.sh
+ t4123-apply-shrink.sh
+ t4252-am-options.sh
+ t4258-am-quoted-cr.sh
Mark them with "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" to notice and fix
promply any new leak that may be introduced and triggered by them in the
future.
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Address some typos in the Git v2.45 changelog.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The changelog entry for the new `git pack-refs --auto` mode only says
that the new flag is useful, but doesn't really say what it does. Add
some more information.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Orgad Shaneh <orgads@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
strbuf_addf() has been reporting a negative return value of vsnprintf(3)
as a bug since f141bd804d (Handle broken vsnprintf implementations in
strbuf, 2007-11-13). Other functions copied that behavior:
7b03c89ebd (add xsnprintf helper function, 2015-09-24)
5ef264dbdb (strbuf.c: add `strbuf_insertf()` and `strbuf_vinsertf()`, 2019-02-25)
8d25663d70 (mem-pool: add mem_pool_strfmt(), 2024-02-25)
However, vsnprintf(3) can legitimately return a negative value if the
formatted output would be longer than INT_MAX. Stop accusing it of
being broken and just report the fact that formatting failed.
Suggested-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Alexander Shopov <ash@kambanaria.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jean-Noël Avila <jn.avila@free.fr>
|
|
The previous team has not maintained the translation since 2.37. Leader
has agreed to transfer leadership to me.
Signed-off-by: Vũ Tiến Hưng <newcomerminecraft@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
|
|
In the wake of fixing a vulnerability where `git clone` mistakenly
followed a symbolic link that it had just written while checking out
files, writing into a gitdir, let's add some defense-in-depth by
teaching `git fsck` to report symbolic links stored in its trees that
point inside `.git/`.
Even though the Git project never made any promises about the exact
shape of the `.git/` directory's contents, there are likely repositories
out there containing symbolic links that point inside the gitdir. For
that reason, let's only report these as warnings, not as errors.
Security-conscious users are encouraged to configure
`fsck.symlinkPointsToGitDir = error`.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
|
|
Quite frequently, when vulnerabilities were found in Git's (quite
complex) clone machinery, a relatively common way to escalate the
severity was to trick Git into running a hook which is actually a script
that has just been laid on disk as part of that clone. This constitutes
a Remote Code Execution vulnerability, the highest severity observed in
Git's vulnerabilities so far.
Some previously-fixed vulnerabilities allowed malicious repositories to
be crafted such that Git would check out files not in the worktree, but
in, say, a submodule's `<git>/hooks/` directory.
A vulnerability that "merely" allows to modify the Git config would
allow a related attack vector, to manipulate Git into looking in the
worktree for hooks, e.g. redirecting the location where Git looks for
hooks, via setting `core.hooksPath` (which would be classified as
CWE-427: Uncontrolled Search Path Element and CWE-114: Process Control,
for more details see https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/427.html and
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/114.html).
To prevent that attack vector, let's error out and complain loudly if an
active `core.hooksPath` configuration is seen in the repository-local
Git config during a `git clone`.
There is one caveat: This changes Git's behavior in a slightly
backwards-incompatible manner. While it is probably a rare scenario (if
it exists at all) to configure `core.hooksPath` via a config in the Git
templates, it _is_ conceivable that some valid setup requires this to
work. In the hopefully very unlikely case that a user runs into this,
there is an escape hatch: set the `GIT_CLONE_PROTECTION_ACTIVE=false`
environment variable. Obviously, this should be done only with utmost
caution.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
|
|
The ability to configuring the template directory is a delicate feature:
It allows defining hooks that will be run e.g. during a `git clone`
operation, such as the `post-checkout` hook.
As such, it is of utmost importance that Git would not allow that config
setting to be changed during a `git clone` by mistake, allowing an
attacker a chance for a Remote Code Execution, allowing attackers to run
arbitrary code on unsuspecting users' machines.
As a defense-in-depth measure, to prevent minor vulnerabilities in the
`git clone` code from ballooning into higher-serverity attack vectors,
let's make this a protected setting just like `safe.directory` and
friends, i.e. ignore any `init.templateDir` entries from any local
config.
Note: This does not change the behavior of any recursive clone (modulo
bugs), as the local repository config is not even supposed to be written
while cloning the superproject, except in one scenario: If a config
template is configured that sets the template directory. This might be
done because `git clone --recurse-submodules --template=<directory>`
does not pass that template directory on to the submodules'
initialization.
Another scenario where this commit changes behavior is where
repositories are _not_ cloned recursively, and then some (intentional,
benign) automation configures the template directory to be used before
initializing the submodules.
So the caveat is that this could theoretically break existing processes.
In both scenarios, there is a way out, though: configuring the template
directory via the environment variable `GIT_TEMPLATE_DIR`.
This change in behavior is a trade-off between security and
backwards-compatibility that is struck in favor of security.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
|
|
Critical security issues typically combine relatively common
vulnerabilities such as case confusion in file paths with other
weaknesses in order to raise the severity of the attack.
One such weakness that has haunted the Git project in many a
submodule-related CVE is that any hooks that are found are executed
during a clone operation. Examples are the `post-checkout` and
`fsmonitor` hooks.
However, Git's design calls for hooks to be disabled by default, as only
disabled example hooks are copied over from the templates in
`<prefix>/share/git-core/templates/`.
As a defense-in-depth measure, let's prevent those hooks from running.
Obviously, administrators can choose to drop enabled hooks into the
template directory, though, _and_ it is also possible to override
`core.hooksPath`, in which case the new check needs to be disabled.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
|
|
In the next commit, Git will learn to disallow hooks during `git clone`
operations _except_ when those hooks come from the templates (which are
inherently supposed to be trusted). To that end, we add a function to
compare the contents of two files.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
|
|
We will need to call this function from `hook.c` to be able to prevent
hooks from running that were written as part of a `clone` but did not
originate from the template directory.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
|
