| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
clocksource_delta() has two variants. One with a check for negative motion,
which is only selected by x86. This is a historic leftover as this function
was previously used in the time getter hot paths.
Since 135225a363ae timekeeping_cycles_to_ns() has unconditional protection
against this as a by-product of the protection against 64bit math overflow.
clocksource_delta() is only used in the clocksource watchdog and in
timekeeping_advance(). The extra conditional there is not hurting anyone.
Remove the config option and unconditionally prevent negative motion of the
readout.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241031120328.599430157@linutronix.de
|
|
Since 135225a363ae timekeeping_cycles_to_ns() handles large offsets which
would lead to 64bit multiplication overflows correctly. It's also protected
against negative motion of the clocksource unconditionally, which was
exclusive to x86 before.
timekeeping_advance() handles large offsets already correctly.
That means the value of CONFIG_DEBUG_TIMEKEEPING which analyzed these cases
is very close to zero. Remove all of it.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241031120328.536010148@linutronix.de
|
|
__run_timer_base() checks base::next_expiry without holding
base::lock. That can race with a remote CPU updating next_expiry under the
lock. This is an intentional and harmless data race, but lacks a
READ_ONCE(), so KCSAN complains about this.
Add the missing READ_ONCE(). All other places are covered already.
Fixes: 79f8b28e85f8 ("timers: Annotate possible non critical data race of next_expiry")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/87a5emyqk0.ffs@tglx
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202410301205.ef8e9743-lkp@intel.com
|
|
The generic clockevent layer now detaches and stops the underlying
clockevent from the dying CPU, unifying the tick behaviour for both
periodic and oneshot mode on offline CPUs. There is no more need for
the tick layer to care about that.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241029125451.54574-4-frederic@kernel.org
|
|
The way the clockevent devices are finally stopped while a CPU is
offlining is currently chaotic. The layout being by order:
1) tick_sched_timer_dying() stops the tick and the underlying clockevent
but only for oneshot case. The periodic tick and its related
clockevent still runs.
2) tick_broadcast_offline() detaches and stops the per-cpu oneshot
broadcast and append it to the released list.
3) Some individual clockevent drivers stop the clockevents (a second time if
the tick is oneshot)
4) Once the CPU is dead, a control CPU remotely detaches and stops
(a 3rd time if oneshot mode) the CPU clockevent and adds it to the
released list.
5) The released list containing the broadcast device released on step 2)
and the remotely detached clockevent from step 4) are unregistered.
These random events can be factorized if the current clockevent is
detached and stopped by the dying CPU at the generic layer, that is
from the dying CPU:
a) Stop the tick
b) Stop/detach the underlying per-cpu oneshot broadcast clockevent
c) Stop/detach the underlying clockevent
d) Release / unregister the clockevents from b) and c)
e) Release / unregister the remaining clockevents from the dying CPU.
This part could be performed by the dying CPU
This way the drivers and the tick layer don't need to care about
clockevent operations during cpuhotplug down. This also unifies the tick
behaviour on offline CPUs between oneshot and periodic modes, avoiding
offline ticks altogether for sanity.
Adopt the simplification.
[ tglx: Remove the WARN_ON() in clockevents_register_device() as that
is called from an upcoming CPU before the CPU is marked online ]
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241029125451.54574-3-frederic@kernel.org
|
|
When a new clockevent device is added and replaces a previous device,
the latter is put into the released list. Then the released list is
added back.
This may look counter-intuitive but the reason is that released device
might be suitable for other uses. For example a released CPU regular
clockevent can be a better replacement for the current broadcast event.
Similarly a released broadcast clockevent can be a better replacement
for the current regular clockevent of a given CPU.
Improve comments stating about these subtleties.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241029125451.54574-2-frederic@kernel.org
|
|
Right now the state tracking is done by two struct members:
- it_active:
A boolean which tracks armed/disarmed state
- it_signal_seq:
A sequence counter which is used to invalidate settings
and prevent rearming
Replace it_active with it_status and keep properly track about the states
in one place.
This allows to reuse it_signal_seq to track reprogramming, disarm and
delete operations in order to drop signals which are related to the state
previous of those operations.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241001083835.670337048@linutronix.de
|
|
Prepare for using this struct member to do a proper reprogramming and
deletion accounting so that stale signals can be dropped.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241001083835.611997737@linutronix.de
|
|
No point in delivering a signal from the past. POSIX does not specify the
behaviour here:
- "The effect of disarming or resetting a timer with pending expiration
notifications is unspecified."
- "The disposition of pending signals for the deleted timer is unspecified."
In both cases it is reasonable to expect that pending signals are
discarded. Especially in the reprogramming case it does not make sense to
account for previous overruns or to deliver a signal for a timer which has
been disarmed.
Drop the signal as that is conistent and understandable behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241001083835.553646280@linutronix.de
|
|
In case that a timer was reprogrammed or deleted an already pending signal
is obsolete. Right now such signals are kept around and eventually
delivered. While POSIX is blury about this:
- "The effect of disarming or resetting a timer with pending expiration
notifications is unspecified."
- "The disposition of pending signals for the deleted timer is
unspecified."
it is reasonable in both cases to expect that pending signals are discarded
as they have no meaning anymore.
Prepare the signal code to allow dropping posix timer signals.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241001083835.494416923@linutronix.de
|
|
The si_sys_private member of the siginfo which is embedded in the
preallocated sigqueue is used by the posix timer code to decide whether a
timer must be reprogrammed on signal delivery.
The handling of this is racy as a long standing comment in that code
documents. It is modified with the timer lock held, but without sighand
lock being held. The actual signal delivery code checks for it under
sighand lock without holding the timer lock.
Hand the new value to send_sigqueue() as argument and store it with sighand
lock held. This is an intermediate change to address this issue.
The arguments to this function will be cleanup in subsequent changes.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241001083835.434338954@linutronix.de
|
|
Move the itimer rearming out of the signal code and consolidate all posix
timer related functions in the signal code under one ifdef.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241001083835.314100569@linutronix.de
|
|
The details about the handling of the "normal" values were moved
to the _msecs_to_jiffies() helpers in commit ca42aaf0c861 ("time:
Refactor msecs_to_jiffies"). However, the same commit still mentioned
__msecs_to_jiffies() in the added documentation.
Thus point to _msecs_to_jiffies() instead.
Fixes: ca42aaf0c861 ("time: Refactor msecs_to_jiffies")
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241025110141.157205-2-ojeda@kernel.org
|
|
The documentation's intention is to compare msecs_to_jiffies() (first
sentence) with __msecs_to_jiffies() (second sentence), which is what the
original documentation did. One of the cleanups in commit f3cb80804b82
("time: Fix various kernel-doc problems") may have thought the paragraph
was talking about the latter since that is what it is being documented.
Thus revert that part of the change.
Fixes: f3cb80804b82 ("time: Fix various kernel-doc problems")
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241025110141.157205-1-ojeda@kernel.org
|
|
timekeeping_update_staged() is the only call site of timekeeping_update().
Merge those functions. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-25-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
|
|
All call sites of using TK_MIRROR flag in timekeeping_update() are
gone. The TK_MIRROR dependent code path is therefore dead code.
Remove it along with the TK_MIRROR define.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-24-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
|
|
Updates of the timekeeper can be done by operating on the shadow timekeeper
and afterwards copying the result into the real timekeeper. This has the
advantage, that the sequence count write protected region is kept as small
as possible.
Convert do_adjtimex() to use this scheme and take the opportunity to use a
scoped_guard() for locking.
That requires to have a separate function for updating the leap state so
that the update is protected by the sequence count. This also brings the
timekeeper and the shadow timekeeper in sync for this state, which was not
the case so far. That's not a correctness problem as the state is only used
at the read sides which use the real timekeeper, but it's inconsistent
nevertheless.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-23-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
|
|
Updates of the timekeeper can be done by operating on the shadow timekeeper
and afterwards copying the result into the real timekeeper. This has the
advantage, that the sequence count write protected region is kept as small
as possible.
While the sequence count held time is not relevant for the resume path as
there is no concurrency, there is no reason to have this function
different than all the other update sites.
Convert timekeeping_inject_offset() to use this scheme and cleanup the
variable declarations while at it.
As halt_fast_timekeeper() does not need protection sequence counter, it is
no problem to move it with this change outside of the sequence counter
protected area. But it still needs to be executed while holding the lock.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-22-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
|
|
Updates of the timekeeper can be done by operating on the shadow timekeeper
and afterwards copying the result into the real timekeeper. This has the
advantage, that the sequence count write protected region is kept as small
as possible.
While the sequence count held time is not relevant for the resume path as
there is no concurrency, there is no reason to have this function
different than all the other update sites.
Convert timekeeping_inject_offset() to use this scheme and cleanup the
variable declaration while at it.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-21-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
|
|
Updates of the timekeeper can be done by operating on the shadow timekeeper
and afterwards copying the result into the real timekeeper. This has the
advantage, that the sequence count write protected region is kept as small
as possible.
Convert timekeeping_inject_sleeptime64() to use this scheme.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-20-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
|
|
For timekeeping_init() the sequence count write held time is not relevant
and it could keep working on the real timekeeper, but there is no reason to
make it different from other timekeeper updates.
Convert it to operate on the shadow timekeeper.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-19-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
|
|
Updates of the timekeeper can be done by operating on the shadow timekeeper
and afterwards copying the result into the real timekeeper. This has the
advantage, that the sequence count write protected region is kept as small
as possible.
Convert change_clocksource() to use this scheme.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-18-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
|
|
Updates of the timekeeper can be done by operating on the shadow timekeeper
and afterwards copying the result into the real timekeeper. This has the
advantage, that the sequence count write protected region is kept as small
as possible.
Convert timekeeping_inject_offset() to use this scheme.
That allows to use a scoped_guard() for locking the timekeeper lock as the
usage of the shadow timekeeper allows a rollback in the error case instead
of the full timekeeper update of the original code.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-17-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
|
|
Updates of the timekeeper can be done by operating on the shadow timekeeper
and afterwards copying the result into the real timekeeper. This has the
advantage, that the sequence count write protected region is kept as small
as possible.
Convert do_settimeofday64() to use this scheme.
That allows to use a scoped_guard() for locking the timekeeper lock as the
usage of the shadow timekeeper allows a rollback in the error case instead
of the full timekeeper update of the original code.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-16-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
|
|
Functions which operate on the real timekeeper, e.g. do_settimeofday(),
have error conditions. If they are hit a full timekeeping update is still
required because the already committed operations modified the timekeeper.
When switching these functions to operate on the shadow timekeeper then the
full update can be avoided in the error case, but the modified shadow
timekeeper has to be restored.
Provide a helper function for that.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-15-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
|
|
Instead of explicitly listing all the separate timekeeping actions flags,
introduce a new one which covers all actions except TK_MIRROR action.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-14-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
|
|
timekeeping_advance() is the only optimized function which uses
shadow_timekeeper for updating the real timekeeper to keep the sequence
counter protected region as small as possible.
To be able to transform timekeeper updates in other functions to use the
same logic, split out functionality into a separate function
timekeeper_update_staged().
While at it, document the reason why the sequence counter must be write
held over the call to timekeeping_update() and the copying to the real
timekeeper and why using a pointer based update is suboptimal.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-13-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
|
|
Updates of the timekeeper are done in two ways:
1. Updating timekeeper and afterwards memcpy()'ing the result into
shadow_timekeeper using timekeeping_update(). Used everywhere for
updates except in timekeeping_advance(); the sequence counter protected
region starts before the first change to the timekeeper is done.
2. Updating shadow_timekeeper and then memcpy()'ing the result into
timekeeper. Used only by in timekeeping_advance(); The seqence counter
protected region is only around timekeeping_update() and the memcpy for
copy from shadow to timekeeper.
The second option is fast path optimized. The sequence counter protected
region is as short as possible.
As this behaviour is mainly documented by commit messages, but not in code,
it makes the not easy timekeeping code more complicated to read.
There is no reason why updates to the timekeeper can't use the optimized
version everywhere. With this, the code will be cleaner, as code is reused
instead of duplicated.
To be able to access tk_data which contains all required information, add a
pointer to tk_data as an argument to timekeeping_update(). With that
convert the comment about holding the lock into a lockdep assert.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-12-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
|
|
Initialization of lock and seqcount needs to be done for every instance of
timekeeper struct. To be able to easily reuse it, create a separate
function for it.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-11-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
|
|
The struct tk_core uses is not reusable. As long as there is only a single
timekeeper, this is not a problem. But when the timekeeper infrastructure
will be reused for per ptp clock timekeepers, an explicit struct type is
required.
Define struct tk_data as explicit struct type for tk_core.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-10-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
|
|
timekeeper_lock protects updates to struct tk_core but is not part of
struct tk_core. As long as there is only a single timekeeper, this is not a
problem. But when the timekeeper infrastructure will be reused for per ptp
clock timekeepers, timekeeper_lock needs to be part of tk_core.
Move the lock into tk_core, move initialisation of the lock and sequence
counter into timekeeping_init() and update all users of timekeeper_lock.
As this is touching all lock sites, convert them to use:
guard(raw_spinlock_irqsave)(&tk_core.lock);
instead of lock/unlock functions whenever possible.
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-9-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
|
|
timekeeper_lock protects updates of timekeeper (tk_core). It is also used
by vdso_update_begin/end() and not only internally by the timekeeper code.
As long as there is only a single timekeeper, this works fine. But when
the timekeeper infrastructure will be reused for per ptp clock timekeepers,
timekeeper_lock needs to be part of tk_core..
Therefore encapuslate locking/unlocking of timekeeper_lock and make the
lock static.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-8-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
|
|
tk_core requires shadow_timekeeper to allow timekeeping_advance() updating
without holding the timekeeper sequence count write locked. This allows the
readers to make progress up to the actual update where the shadow
timekeeper is copied over to the real timekeeper.
As long as there is only a single timekeeper, having them separate is
fine. But when the timekeeper infrastructure will be reused for per ptp
clock timekeepers, shadow_timekeeper needs to be part of tk_core.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-7-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
|
|
timekeeping_advance() takes the timekeeper_lock and releases it before
returning. When an early return is required, goto statements are used to
make sure the lock is realeased properly. When the code was written the
locking guard() was not yet available.
Use the guard() to simplify the code and while at it cleanup ordering of
function variables. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-5-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
|
|
There is no point to go through a full timekeeping update when acquiring a
module reference or enabling the new clocksource fails.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-4-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
|
|
do_adjtimex() invokes tk_update_leap_state() unconditionally even when a
previous invocation of timekeeping_update() already did that update.
Put it into the else path which is invoked when timekeeping_update() is not
called.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-3-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
|
|
hard_pps() update does not modify anything which might be required by time
readers so forcing readers out of the way during the update is a pointless
exercise.
The interaction with adjtimex() and timekeeper updates which call into the
NTP code is properly serialized by timekeeper_lock.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-2-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
|
|
No point in reading it a second time when the comparison fails.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-ptp-timekeeping-v2-1-554456a44a15@linutronix.de
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net
Pull networking fixes from Paolo Abeni:
"Including fixes from netfiler, xfrm and bluetooth.
Oddly this includes a fix for a posix clock regression; in our
previous PR we included a change there as a pre-requisite for
networking one. That fix proved to be buggy and requires the follow-up
included here. Thomas suggested we should send it, given we sent the
buggy patch.
Current release - regressions:
- posix-clock: Fix unbalanced locking in pc_clock_settime()
- netfilter: fix typo causing some targets not to load on IPv6
Current release - new code bugs:
- xfrm: policy: remove last remnants of pernet inexact list
Previous releases - regressions:
- core: fix races in netdev_tx_sent_queue()/dev_watchdog()
- bluetooth: fix UAF on sco_sock_timeout
- eth: hv_netvsc: fix VF namespace also in synthetic NIC
NETDEV_REGISTER event
- eth: usbnet: fix name regression
- eth: be2net: fix potential memory leak in be_xmit()
- eth: plip: fix transmit path breakage
Previous releases - always broken:
- sched: deny mismatched skip_sw/skip_hw flags for actions created by
classifiers
- netfilter: bpf: must hold reference on net namespace
- eth: virtio_net: fix integer overflow in stats
- eth: bnxt_en: replace ptp_lock with irqsave variant
- eth: octeon_ep: add SKB allocation failures handling in
__octep_oq_process_rx()
Misc:
- MAINTAINERS: add Simon as an official reviewer"
* tag 'net-6.12-rc5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net: (40 commits)
net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: support 4000ps cycle counter period
net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: read cycle counter period from hardware
net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: group cycle counter coefficients
net: usb: qmi_wwan: add Fibocom FG132 0x0112 composition
hv_netvsc: Fix VF namespace also in synthetic NIC NETDEV_REGISTER event
net: dsa: microchip: disable EEE for KSZ879x/KSZ877x/KSZ876x
Bluetooth: ISO: Fix UAF on iso_sock_timeout
Bluetooth: SCO: Fix UAF on sco_sock_timeout
Bluetooth: hci_core: Disable works on hci_unregister_dev
posix-clock: posix-clock: Fix unbalanced locking in pc_clock_settime()
r8169: avoid unsolicited interrupts
net: sched: use RCU read-side critical section in taprio_dump()
net: sched: fix use-after-free in taprio_change()
net/sched: act_api: deny mismatched skip_sw/skip_hw flags for actions created by classifiers
net: usb: usbnet: fix name regression
mlxsw: spectrum_router: fix xa_store() error checking
virtio_net: fix integer overflow in stats
net: fix races in netdev_tx_sent_queue()/dev_watchdog()
net: wwan: fix global oob in wwan_rtnl_policy
netfilter: xtables: fix typo causing some targets not to load on IPv6
...
|
|
callback
Since SLOB was removed and since commit 6c6c47b063b5 ("mm, slab: call
kvfree_rcu_barrier() from kmem_cache_destroy()"), it is not longer
necessary to use call_rcu() when the callback only performs
kmem_cache_free(). Use kfree_rcu() directly.
The changes were made using Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241013201704.49576-12-Julia.Lawall@inria.fr
|
|
If get_clock_desc() succeeds, it calls fget() for the clockid's fd,
and get the clk->rwsem read lock, so the error path should release
the lock to make the lock balance and fput the clockid's fd to make
the refcount balance and release the fd related resource.
However the below commit left the error path locked behind resulting in
unbalanced locking. Check timespec64_valid_strict() before
get_clock_desc() to fix it, because the "ts" is not changed
after that.
Fixes: d8794ac20a29 ("posix-clock: Fix missing timespec64 check in pc_clock_settime()")
Acked-by: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
[pabeni@redhat.com: fixed commit message typo]
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull scheduling fixes from Borislav Petkov:
- Add PREEMPT_RT maintainers
- Fix another aspect of delayed dequeued tasks wrt determining their
state, i.e., whether they're runnable or blocked
- Handle delayed dequeued tasks and their migration wrt PSI properly
- Fix the situation where a delayed dequeue task gets enqueued into a
new class, which should not happen
- Fix a case where memory allocation would happen while the runqueue
lock is held, which is a no-no
- Do not over-schedule when tasks with shorter slices preempt the
currently running task
- Make sure delayed to deque entities are properly handled before
unthrottling
- Other smaller cleanups and improvements
* tag 'sched_urgent_for_v6.12_rc4' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
MAINTAINERS: Add an entry for PREEMPT_RT.
sched/fair: Fix external p->on_rq users
sched/psi: Fix mistaken CPU pressure indication after corrupted task state bug
sched/core: Dequeue PSI signals for blocked tasks that are delayed
sched: Fix delayed_dequeue vs switched_from_fair()
sched/core: Disable page allocation in task_tick_mm_cid()
sched/deadline: Use hrtick_enabled_dl() before start_hrtick_dl()
sched/eevdf: Fix wakeup-preempt by checking cfs_rq->nr_running
sched: Fix sched_delayed vs cfs_bandwidth
|
|
There is a warning in checkpatch script that triggers, when min and max
arguments of usleep_range_state() are in reverse order. This check does
only cover callsites which uses constants. Add this check into the code as
a WARN_ON_ONCE() to also cover callsites not using constants and fix the
mis-usage by resetting the delta to 0.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241014-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-flseep-v3-9-dc8b907cb62f@linutronix.de
|
|
A lot of commonly used functions for inserting a sleep or delay lack a
proper function description. Add function descriptions to all of them to
have important information in a central place close to the code.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241014-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-flseep-v3-5-dc8b907cb62f@linutronix.de
|
|
schedule_timeout*() functions do not have proper kernel-doc formatted
function descriptions. schedule_hrtimeout() and schedule_hrtimeout_range()
have a almost identical description.
Add missing function descriptions. Remove copy of function description and
add a pointer to the existing description instead.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241014-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-flseep-v3-3-dc8b907cb62f@linutronix.de
|
|
All schedule_timeout() and *sleep*() related functions are interfaces on
top of timer list timers and hrtimers to add a sleep to the code. As they
are built on top of the timer list timers and hrtimers, the [hr]timer
interfaces are already used except when queuing the timer in
schedule_timeout(). But there exists the appropriate interface add_timer()
which does the same job with an extra check for an already pending timer.
Split all those functions as they are into a separate file and use
add_timer() instead of __mod_timer() in schedule_timeout().
While at it fix minor formatting issues and a multi line printk function
call in schedule_timeout().
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241014-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-flseep-v3-2-dc8b907cb62f@linutronix.de
|
|
Change %0 to 0 in kernel-doc comments. %0 is not valid.
Signed-off-by: Wang Jinchao <wangjinchao@xfusion.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241009022135.92400-2-wangjinchao@xfusion.com
|
|
No implementation of this hook uses the passed in timekeeper anymore.
This avoids including a non-VDSO header while building the VDSO, which can
lead to compilation errors.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241010-vdso-generic-arch_update_vsyscall-v1-1-7fe5a3ea4382@linutronix.de
|
|
As Andrew pointed out, it will make sense that the PTP core
checked timespec64 struct's tv_sec and tv_nsec range before calling
ptp->info->settime64().
As the man manual of clock_settime() said, if tp.tv_sec is negative or
tp.tv_nsec is outside the range [0..999,999,999], it should return EINVAL,
which include dynamic clocks which handles PTP clock, and the condition is
consistent with timespec64_valid(). As Thomas suggested, timespec64_valid()
only check the timespec is valid, but not ensure that the time is
in a valid range, so check it ahead using timespec64_valid_strict()
in pc_clock_settime() and return -EINVAL if not valid.
There are some drivers that use tp->tv_sec and tp->tv_nsec directly to
write registers without validity checks and assume that the higher layer
has checked it, which is dangerous and will benefit from this, such as
hclge_ptp_settime(), igb_ptp_settime_i210(), _rcar_gen4_ptp_settime(),
and some drivers can remove the checks of itself.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 0606f422b453 ("posix clocks: Introduce dynamic clocks")
Acked-by: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241009072302.1754567-2-ruanjinjie@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
Sean noted that ever since commit 152e11f6df29 ("sched/fair: Implement
delayed dequeue") KVM's preemption notifiers have started
mis-classifying preemption vs blocking.
Notably p->on_rq is no longer sufficient to determine if a task is
runnable or blocked -- the aforementioned commit introduces tasks that
remain on the runqueue even through they will not run again, and
should be considered blocked for many cases.
Add the task_is_runnable() helper to classify things and audit all
external users of the p->on_rq state. Also add a few comments.
Fixes: 152e11f6df29 ("sched/fair: Implement delayed dequeue")
Reported-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Tested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241010091843.GK33184@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net
|
