| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Instead of exposing the x86-optimized SHA-1 code via x86-specific
crypto_shash algorithms, instead just implement the sha1_blocks()
library function. This is much simpler, it makes the SHA-1 library
functions be x86-optimized, and it fixes the longstanding issue where
the x86-optimized SHA-1 code was disabled by default. SHA-1 still
remains available through crypto_shash, but individual architectures no
longer need to handle it.
To match sha1_blocks(), change the type of the nblocks parameter of the
assembly functions from int to size_t. The assembly functions actually
already treated it as size_t.
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250712232329.818226-14-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Instead of exposing the sparc-optimized SHA-1 code via sparc-specific
crypto_shash algorithms, instead just implement the sha1_blocks()
library function. This is much simpler, it makes the SHA-1 library
functions be sparc-optimized, and it fixes the longstanding issue where
the sparc-optimized SHA-1 code was disabled by default. SHA-1 still
remains available through crypto_shash, but individual architectures no
longer need to handle it.
Note: to see the diff from arch/sparc/crypto/sha1_glue.c to
lib/crypto/sparc/sha1.h, view this commit with 'git show -M10'.
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250712232329.818226-13-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Instead of exposing the s390-optimized SHA-1 code via s390-specific
crypto_shash algorithms, instead just implement the sha1_blocks()
library function. This is much simpler, it makes the SHA-1 library
functions be s390-optimized, and it fixes the longstanding issue where
the s390-optimized SHA-1 code was disabled by default. SHA-1 still
remains available through crypto_shash, but individual architectures no
longer need to handle it.
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250712232329.818226-12-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Instead of exposing the powerpc-optimized SHA-1 code via
powerpc-specific crypto_shash algorithms, instead just implement the
sha1_blocks() library function. This is much simpler, it makes the
SHA-1 library functions be powerpc-optimized, and it fixes the
longstanding issue where the powerpc-optimized SHA-1 code was disabled
by default. SHA-1 still remains available through crypto_shash, but
individual architectures no longer need to handle it.
Note: to see the diff from arch/powerpc/crypto/sha1-spe-glue.c to
lib/crypto/powerpc/sha1.h, view this commit with 'git show -M10'.
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250712232329.818226-11-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Instead of exposing the mips-optimized SHA-1 code via mips-specific
crypto_shash algorithms, instead just implement the sha1_blocks()
library function. This is much simpler, it makes the SHA-1 library
functions be mips-optimized, and it fixes the longstanding issue where
the mips-optimized SHA-1 code was disabled by default. SHA-1 still
remains available through crypto_shash, but individual architectures no
longer need to handle it.
Note: to see the diff from arch/mips/cavium-octeon/crypto/octeon-sha1.c
to lib/crypto/mips/sha1.h, view this commit with 'git show -M10'.
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250712232329.818226-10-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Instead of exposing the arm64-optimized SHA-1 code via arm64-specific
crypto_shash algorithms, instead just implement the sha1_blocks()
library function. This is much simpler, it makes the SHA-1 library
functions be arm64-optimized, and it fixes the longstanding issue where
the arm64-optimized SHA-1 code was disabled by default. SHA-1 still
remains available through crypto_shash, but individual architectures no
longer need to handle it.
Remove support for SHA-1 finalization from assembly code, since the
library does not yet support architecture-specific overrides of the
finalization. (Support for that has been omitted for now, for
simplicity and because usually it isn't performance-critical.)
To match sha1_blocks(), change the type of the nblocks parameter and the
return value of __sha1_ce_transform() from int to size_t. Update the
assembly code accordingly.
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250712232329.818226-9-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Instead of exposing the arm-optimized SHA-1 code via arm-specific
crypto_shash algorithms, instead just implement the sha1_blocks()
library function. This is much simpler, it makes the SHA-1 library
functions be arm-optimized, and it fixes the longstanding issue where
the arm-optimized SHA-1 code was disabled by default. SHA-1 still
remains available through crypto_shash, but individual architectures no
longer need to handle it.
To match sha1_blocks(), change the type of the nblocks parameter of the
assembly functions from int to size_t. The assembly functions actually
already treated it as size_t.
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250712232329.818226-8-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Add HMAC support to the SHA-1 library, again following what was done for
SHA-2. Besides providing the basis for a more streamlined "hmac(sha1)"
shash, this will also be useful for multiple in-kernel users such as
net/sctp/auth.c, net/ipv6/seg6_hmac.c, and
security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm1.c. Those are currently using
crypto_shash, but using the library functions would be much simpler.
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250712232329.818226-5-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Add a library interface for SHA-1, following the SHA-2 one. As was the
case with SHA-2, this will be useful for various in-kernel users. The
crypto_shash interface will be reimplemented on top of it as well.
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250712232329.818226-4-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Rename the existing sha1_init() to sha1_init_raw(), since it conflicts
with the upcoming library function. This will later be removed, but
this keeps the kernel building for the introduction of the library.
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250712232329.818226-3-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
While the HMAC library functions support both incremental and one-shot
computation and both prepared and raw keys, the combination of raw key
+ incremental was missing. It turns out that several potential users of
the HMAC library functions (tpm2-sessions.c, smb2transport.c,
trusted_tpm1.c) want exactly that.
Therefore, add the missing functions hmac_sha*_init_usingrawkey().
Implement them in an optimized way that directly initializes the HMAC
context without a separate key preparation step.
Reimplement the one-shot raw key functions hmac_sha*_usingrawkey() on
top of the new functions, which makes them a bit more efficient.
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250711215844.41715-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Fix poly1305-armv4.pl to not do '.globl poly1305_blocks_neon' when
poly1305_blocks_neon() is not defined. Then, remove the empty __weak
definition of poly1305_blocks_neon(), which was still needed only
because of that unnecessary globl statement. (It also used to be needed
because the compiler could generate calls to it when
CONFIG_KERNEL_MODE_NEON=n, but that has been fixed.)
Thanks to Arnd Bergmann for reporting that the globl statement in the
asm file was still depending on the weak symbol.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250711212822.6372-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Restore the len >= 288 condition on using the AVX implementation, which
was incidentally removed by commit 318c53ae02f2 ("crypto: x86/poly1305 -
Add block-only interface"). This check took into account the overhead
in key power computation, kernel-mode "FPU", and tail handling
associated with the AVX code. Indeed, restoring this check slightly
improves performance for len < 256 as measured using poly1305_kunit on
an "AMD Ryzen AI 9 365" (Zen 5) CPU:
Length Before After
====== ========== ==========
1 30 MB/s 36 MB/s
16 516 MB/s 598 MB/s
64 1700 MB/s 1882 MB/s
127 2265 MB/s 2651 MB/s
128 2457 MB/s 2827 MB/s
200 2702 MB/s 3238 MB/s
256 3841 MB/s 3768 MB/s
511 4580 MB/s 4585 MB/s
512 5430 MB/s 5398 MB/s
1024 7268 MB/s 7305 MB/s
3173 8999 MB/s 8948 MB/s
4096 9942 MB/s 9921 MB/s
16384 10557 MB/s 10545 MB/s
While the optimal threshold for this CPU might be slightly lower than
288 (see the len == 256 case), other CPUs would need to be tested too,
and these sorts of benchmarks can underestimate the true cost of
kernel-mode "FPU". Therefore, for now just restore the 288 threshold.
Fixes: 318c53ae02f2 ("crypto: x86/poly1305 - Add block-only interface")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250706231100.176113-6-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Restore the SIMD usability check and base conversion that were removed
by commit 318c53ae02f2 ("crypto: x86/poly1305 - Add block-only
interface").
This safety check is cheap and is well worth eliminating a footgun.
While the Poly1305 functions should not be called when SIMD registers
are unusable, if they are anyway, they should just do the right thing
instead of corrupting random tasks' registers and/or computing incorrect
MACs. Fixing this is also needed for poly1305_kunit to pass.
Just use irq_fpu_usable() instead of the original crypto_simd_usable(),
since poly1305_kunit won't rely on crypto_simd_disabled_for_test.
Fixes: 318c53ae02f2 ("crypto: x86/poly1305 - Add block-only interface")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250706231100.176113-5-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Restore the SIMD usability check that was removed by commit a59e5468a921
("crypto: arm64/poly1305 - Add block-only interface").
This safety check is cheap and is well worth eliminating a footgun.
While the Poly1305 functions should not be called when SIMD registers
are unusable, if they are anyway, they should just do the right thing
instead of corrupting random tasks' registers and/or computing incorrect
MACs. Fixing this is also needed for poly1305_kunit to pass.
Just use may_use_simd() instead of the original crypto_simd_usable(),
since poly1305_kunit won't rely on crypto_simd_disabled_for_test.
Fixes: a59e5468a921 ("crypto: arm64/poly1305 - Add block-only interface")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250706231100.176113-4-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Restore the SIMD usability check that was removed by commit 773426f4771b
("crypto: arm/poly1305 - Add block-only interface").
This safety check is cheap and is well worth eliminating a footgun.
While the Poly1305 functions should not be called when SIMD registers
are unusable, if they are anyway, they should just do the right thing
instead of corrupting random tasks' registers and/or computing incorrect
MACs. Fixing this is also needed for poly1305_kunit to pass.
Just use may_use_simd() instead of the original crypto_simd_usable(),
since poly1305_kunit won't rely on crypto_simd_disabled_for_test.
Fixes: 773426f4771b ("crypto: arm/poly1305 - Add block-only interface")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250706231100.176113-3-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
crypto/hash_info.c just contains a couple of arrays that map HASH_ALGO_*
algorithm IDs to properties of those algorithms. It is compiled only
when CRYPTO_HASH_INFO=y, but currently CRYPTO_HASH_INFO depends on
CRYPTO. Since this can be useful without the old-school crypto API,
move it into lib/crypto/ so that it no longer depends on CRYPTO.
This eliminates the need for FS_VERITY to select CRYPTO after it's been
converted to use lib/crypto/.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250630172224.46909-2-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Since sha256_blocks() is called only with nblocks >= 1, remove
unnecessary checks for nblocks == 0 from the x86 SHA-256 assembly code.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250704023958.73274-3-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
As I did for sha512_blocks(), reorganize x86's sha256_blocks() to be
just a static_call. To achieve that, for each assembly function add a C
function that handles the kernel-mode FPU section and fallback. While
this increases total code size slightly, the amount of code actually
executed on a given system does not increase, and it is slightly more
efficient since it eliminates the extra static_key. It also makes the
assembly functions be called with standard direct calls instead of
static calls, eliminating the need for ANNOTATE_NOENDBR.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250704023958.73274-2-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
The BLOCK_HASH_UPDATE_BLOCKS macro is difficult to read. For now, let's
just write the update explicitly in the straightforward way, mirroring
sha512_update(). It's possible that we'll bring back a macro for this
later, but it needs to be properly justified and hopefully a bit more
readable.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250630160645.3198-14-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Consolidate the CPU-based SHA-256 code into a single module, following
what I did with SHA-512:
- Each arch now provides a header file lib/crypto/$(SRCARCH)/sha256.h,
replacing lib/crypto/$(SRCARCH)/sha256.c. The header defines
sha256_blocks() and optionally sha256_mod_init_arch(). It is included
by lib/crypto/sha256.c, and thus the code gets built into the single
libsha256 module, with proper inlining and dead code elimination.
- sha256_blocks_generic() is moved from lib/crypto/sha256-generic.c into
lib/crypto/sha256.c. It's now a static function marked with
__maybe_unused, so the compiler automatically eliminates it in any
cases where it's not used.
- Whether arch-optimized SHA-256 is buildable is now controlled
centrally by lib/crypto/Kconfig instead of by
lib/crypto/$(SRCARCH)/Kconfig. The conditions for enabling it remain
the same as before, and it remains enabled by default.
- Any additional arch-specific translation units for the optimized
SHA-256 code (such as assembly files) are now compiled by
lib/crypto/Makefile instead of lib/crypto/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250630160645.3198-13-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Remove sha256_is_arch_optimized(), since it is no longer used.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250630160645.3198-12-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Since HMAC support is commonly needed and is fairly simple, include it
as a first-class citizen of the SHA-256 library.
The API supports both incremental and one-shot computation, and either
preparing the key ahead of time or just using a raw key. The
implementation is much more streamlined than crypto/hmac.c.
I've kept it consistent with the HMAC-SHA384 and HMAC-SHA512 code as
much as possible.
Testing of these functions will be via sha224_kunit and sha256_kunit,
added by a later commit.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250630160645.3198-9-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
The previous commit made the SHA-256 compression function state be
strongly typed, but it wasn't propagated all the way down to the
implementations of it. Do that now.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250630160645.3198-8-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Currently the SHA-224 and SHA-256 library functions can be mixed
arbitrarily, even in ways that are incorrect, for example using
sha224_init() and sha256_final(). This is because they operate on the
same structure, sha256_state.
Introduce stronger typing, as I did for SHA-384 and SHA-512.
Also as I did for SHA-384 and SHA-512, use the names *_ctx instead of
*_state. The *_ctx names have the following small benefits:
- They're shorter.
- They avoid an ambiguity with the compression function state.
- They're consistent with the well-known OpenSSL API.
- Users usually name the variable 'sctx' anyway, which suggests that
*_ctx would be the more natural name for the actual struct.
Therefore: update the SHA-224 and SHA-256 APIs, implementation, and
calling code accordingly.
In the new structs, also strongly-type the compression function state.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250630160645.3198-7-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Add a one-shot SHA-224 computation function sha224(), for consistency
with sha256(), sha384(), and sha512() which all already exist.
Similarly, add sha224_update(). While for now it's identical to
sha256_update(), omitting it makes the API harder to use since users
have to "know" which functions are the same between SHA-224 and SHA-256.
Also, this is a prerequisite for using different context types for each.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250630160645.3198-6-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Instead of having both sha256_blocks_arch() and sha256_blocks_simd(),
instead have just sha256_blocks_arch() which uses the most efficient
implementation that is available in the calling context.
This is simpler, as it reduces the API surface. It's also safer, since
sha256_blocks_arch() just works in all contexts, including contexts
where the FPU/SIMD/vector registers cannot be used. This doesn't mean
that SHA-256 computations *should* be done in such contexts, but rather
we should just do the right thing instead of corrupting a random task's
registers. Eliminating this footgun and simplifying the code is well
worth the very small performance cost of doing the check.
Note: in the case of arm and arm64, what used to be sha256_blocks_arch()
is renamed back to its original name of sha256_block_data_order().
sha256_blocks_arch() is now used for the higher-level dispatch function.
This renaming also required an update to lib/crypto/arm64/sha512.h,
since sha2-armv8.pl is shared by both SHA-256 and SHA-512.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250630160645.3198-5-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
First, move the declarations of sha224_init/update/final to be just
above the corresponding SHA-256 code, matching the order that I used for
SHA-384 and SHA-512. In sha2.h, the end result is that SHA-224,
SHA-256, SHA-384, and SHA-512 are all in the logical order.
Second, move sha224_block_init() and sha256_block_init() to be just
below crypto_sha256_state. In later changes, these functions as well as
struct crypto_sha256_state will no longer be used by the library
functions. They'll remain just for some legacy offload drivers. This
gets them into a logical place in the file for that.
No code changes other than reordering.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250630160645.3198-4-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
The MIPS32r2 ChaCha code has never been buildable with the clang
assembler. First, clang doesn't support the 'rotl' pseudo-instruction:
error: unknown instruction, did you mean: rol, rotr?
Second, clang requires that both operands of the 'wsbh' instruction be
explicitly given:
error: too few operands for instruction
To fix this, align the code with the real instruction set by (1) using
the real instruction 'rotr' instead of the nonstandard pseudo-
instruction 'rotl', and (2) explicitly giving both operands to 'wsbh'.
To make removing the use of 'rotl' a bit easier, also remove the
unnecessary special-casing for big endian CPUs at
.Lchacha_mips_xor_bytes. The tail handling is actually
endian-independent since it processes one byte at a time. On big endian
CPUs the old code byte-swapped SAVED_X, then iterated through it in
reverse order. But the byteswap and reverse iteration canceled out.
Tested with chacha20poly1305-selftest in QEMU using "-M malta" with both
little endian and big endian mips32r2 kernels.
Fixes: 49aa7c00eddf ("crypto: mips/chacha - import 32r2 ChaCha code from Zinc")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505080409.EujEBwA0-lkp@intel.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250619225535.679301-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Move the contents of arch/x86/lib/crypto/ into lib/crypto/x86/.
The new code organization makes a lot more sense for how this code
actually works and is developed. In particular, it makes it possible to
build each algorithm as a single module, with better inlining and dead
code elimination. For a more detailed explanation, see the patchset
which did this for the CRC library code:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250607200454.73587-1-ebiggers@kernel.org/.
Also see the patchset which did this for SHA-512:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/20250616014019.415791-1-ebiggers@kernel.org/
This is just a preparatory commit, which does the move to get the files
into their new location but keeps them building the same way as before.
Later commits will make the actual improvements to the way the
arch-optimized code is integrated for each algorithm.
Add a gitignore entry for the removed directory arch/x86/lib/crypto/ so
that people don't accidentally commit leftover generated files.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250619191908.134235-9-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Move the contents of arch/sparc/lib/crypto/ into lib/crypto/sparc/.
The new code organization makes a lot more sense for how this code
actually works and is developed. In particular, it makes it possible to
build each algorithm as a single module, with better inlining and dead
code elimination. For a more detailed explanation, see the patchset
which did this for the CRC library code:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250607200454.73587-1-ebiggers@kernel.org/.
Also see the patchset which did this for SHA-512:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/20250616014019.415791-1-ebiggers@kernel.org/
This is just a preparatory commit, which does the move to get the files
into their new location but keeps them building the same way as before.
Later commits will make the actual improvements to the way the
arch-optimized code is integrated for each algorithm.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250619191908.134235-8-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Move the contents of arch/s390/lib/crypto/ into lib/crypto/s390/.
The new code organization makes a lot more sense for how this code
actually works and is developed. In particular, it makes it possible to
build each algorithm as a single module, with better inlining and dead
code elimination. For a more detailed explanation, see the patchset
which did this for the CRC library code:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250607200454.73587-1-ebiggers@kernel.org/.
Also see the patchset which did this for SHA-512:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/20250616014019.415791-1-ebiggers@kernel.org/
This is just a preparatory commit, which does the move to get the files
into their new location but keeps them building the same way as before.
Later commits will make the actual improvements to the way the
arch-optimized code is integrated for each algorithm.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250619191908.134235-7-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Move the contents of arch/riscv/lib/crypto/ into lib/crypto/riscv/.
The new code organization makes a lot more sense for how this code
actually works and is developed. In particular, it makes it possible to
build each algorithm as a single module, with better inlining and dead
code elimination. For a more detailed explanation, see the patchset
which did this for the CRC library code:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250607200454.73587-1-ebiggers@kernel.org/.
Also see the patchset which did this for SHA-512:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/20250616014019.415791-1-ebiggers@kernel.org/
This is just a preparatory commit, which does the move to get the files
into their new location but keeps them building the same way as before.
Later commits will make the actual improvements to the way the
arch-optimized code is integrated for each algorithm.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250619191908.134235-6-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Move the contents of arch/powerpc/lib/crypto/ into lib/crypto/powerpc/.
The new code organization makes a lot more sense for how this code
actually works and is developed. In particular, it makes it possible to
build each algorithm as a single module, with better inlining and dead
code elimination. For a more detailed explanation, see the patchset
which did this for the CRC library code:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250607200454.73587-1-ebiggers@kernel.org/.
Also see the patchset which did this for SHA-512:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/20250616014019.415791-1-ebiggers@kernel.org/
This is just a preparatory commit, which does the move to get the files
into their new location but keeps them building the same way as before.
Later commits will make the actual improvements to the way the
arch-optimized code is integrated for each algorithm.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250619191908.134235-5-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Move the contents of arch/mips/lib/crypto/ into lib/crypto/mips/.
The new code organization makes a lot more sense for how this code
actually works and is developed. In particular, it makes it possible to
build each algorithm as a single module, with better inlining and dead
code elimination. For a more detailed explanation, see the patchset
which did this for the CRC library code:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250607200454.73587-1-ebiggers@kernel.org/.
Also see the patchset which did this for SHA-512:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/20250616014019.415791-1-ebiggers@kernel.org/
This is just a preparatory commit, which does the move to get the files
into their new location but keeps them building the same way as before.
Later commits will make the actual improvements to the way the
arch-optimized code is integrated for each algorithm.
Add a gitignore entry for the removed directory arch/mips/lib/crypto/ so
that people don't accidentally commit leftover generated files.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250619191908.134235-4-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Move the contents of arch/arm64/lib/crypto/ into lib/crypto/arm64/.
The new code organization makes a lot more sense for how this code
actually works and is developed. In particular, it makes it possible to
build each algorithm as a single module, with better inlining and dead
code elimination. For a more detailed explanation, see the patchset
which did this for the CRC library code:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250607200454.73587-1-ebiggers@kernel.org/.
Also see the patchset which did this for SHA-512:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/20250616014019.415791-1-ebiggers@kernel.org/
This is just a preparatory commit, which does the move to get the files
into their new location but keeps them building the same way as before.
Later commits will make the actual improvements to the way the
arch-optimized code is integrated for each algorithm.
Add a gitignore entry for the removed directory arch/arm64/lib/crypto/
so that people don't accidentally commit leftover generated files.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250619191908.134235-3-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Move the contents of arch/arm/lib/crypto/ into lib/crypto/arm/.
The new code organization makes a lot more sense for how this code
actually works and is developed. In particular, it makes it possible to
build each algorithm as a single module, with better inlining and dead
code elimination. For a more detailed explanation, see the patchset
which did this for the CRC library code:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250607200454.73587-1-ebiggers@kernel.org/.
Also see the patchset which did this for SHA-512:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/20250616014019.415791-1-ebiggers@kernel.org/
This is just a preparatory commit, which does the move to get the files
into their new location but keeps them building the same way as before.
Later commits will make the actual improvements to the way the
arch-optimized code is integrated for each algorithm.
Add a gitignore entry for the removed directory arch/arm/lib/crypto/ so
that people don't accidentally commit leftover generated files.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250619191908.134235-2-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Since sha512_blocks() is called only with nblocks >= 1, remove
unnecessary checks for nblocks == 0 from the x86 SHA-512 assembly code.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250630160320.2888-16-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Instead of exposing the x86-optimized SHA-512 code via x86-specific
crypto_shash algorithms, instead just implement the sha512_blocks()
library function. This is much simpler, it makes the SHA-512 (and
SHA-384) library functions be x86-optimized, and it fixes the
longstanding issue where the x86-optimized SHA-512 code was disabled by
default. SHA-512 still remains available through crypto_shash, but
individual architectures no longer need to handle it.
To match sha512_blocks(), change the type of the nblocks parameter of
the assembly functions from int to size_t. The assembly functions
actually already treated it as size_t.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250630160320.2888-15-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Instead of exposing the sparc-optimized SHA-512 code via sparc-specific
crypto_shash algorithms, instead just implement the sha512_blocks()
library function. This is much simpler, it makes the SHA-512 (and
SHA-384) library functions be sparc-optimized, and it fixes the
longstanding issue where the sparc-optimized SHA-512 code was disabled
by default. SHA-512 still remains available through crypto_shash, but
individual architectures no longer need to handle it.
To match sha512_blocks(), change the type of the nblocks parameter of
the assembly function from int to size_t. The assembly function
actually already treated it as size_t.
Note: to see the diff from arch/sparc/crypto/sha512_glue.c to
lib/crypto/sparc/sha512.h, view this commit with 'git show -M10'.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250630160320.2888-14-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Instead of exposing the s390-optimized SHA-512 code via s390-specific
crypto_shash algorithms, instead just implement the sha512_blocks()
library function. This is much simpler, it makes the SHA-512 (and
SHA-384) library functions be s390-optimized, and it fixes the
longstanding issue where the s390-optimized SHA-512 code was disabled by
default. SHA-512 still remains available through crypto_shash, but
individual architectures no longer need to handle it.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250630160320.2888-13-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Instead of exposing the riscv-optimized SHA-512 code via riscv-specific
crypto_shash algorithms, instead just implement the sha512_blocks()
library function. This is much simpler, it makes the SHA-512 (and
SHA-384) library functions be riscv-optimized, and it fixes the
longstanding issue where the riscv-optimized SHA-512 code was disabled
by default. SHA-512 still remains available through crypto_shash, but
individual architectures no longer need to handle it.
To match sha512_blocks(), change the type of the nblocks parameter of
the assembly function from int to size_t. The assembly function
actually already treated it as size_t.
Note: to see the diff from arch/riscv/crypto/sha512-riscv64-glue.c to
lib/crypto/riscv/sha512.h, view this commit with 'git show -M10'.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250630160320.2888-12-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Instead of exposing the mips-optimized SHA-512 code via mips-specific
crypto_shash algorithms, instead just implement the sha512_blocks()
library function. This is much simpler, it makes the SHA-512 (and
SHA-384) library functions be mips-optimized, and it fixes the
longstanding issue where the mips-optimized SHA-512 code was disabled by
default. SHA-512 still remains available through crypto_shash, but
individual architectures no longer need to handle it.
Note: to see the diff from
arch/mips/cavium-octeon/crypto/octeon-sha512.c to
lib/crypto/mips/sha512.h, view this commit with 'git show -M10'.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250630160320.2888-11-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Instead of exposing the arm64-optimized SHA-512 code via arm64-specific
crypto_shash algorithms, instead just implement the sha512_blocks()
library function. This is much simpler, it makes the SHA-512 (and
SHA-384) library functions be arm64-optimized, and it fixes the
longstanding issue where the arm64-optimized SHA-512 code was disabled
by default. SHA-512 still remains available through crypto_shash, but
individual architectures no longer need to handle it.
To match sha512_blocks(), change the type of the nblocks parameter of
the assembly functions from int or 'unsigned int' to size_t. Update the
ARMv8 CE assembly function accordingly. The scalar assembly function
actually already treated it as size_t.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250630160320.2888-9-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Instead of exposing the arm-optimized SHA-512 code via arm-specific
crypto_shash algorithms, instead just implement the sha512_blocks()
library function. This is much simpler, it makes the SHA-512 (and
SHA-384) library functions be arm-optimized, and it fixes the
longstanding issue where the arm-optimized SHA-512 code was disabled by
default. SHA-512 still remains available through crypto_shash, but
individual architectures no longer need to handle it.
To match sha512_blocks(), change the type of the nblocks parameter of
the assembly functions from int to size_t. The assembly functions
actually already treated it as size_t.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250630160320.2888-8-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Since HMAC support is commonly needed and is fairly simple, include it
as a first-class citizen of the SHA-512 library.
The API supports both incremental and one-shot computation, and either
preparing the key ahead of time or just using a raw key. The
implementation is much more streamlined than crypto/hmac.c.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250630160320.2888-4-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Add basic support for SHA-384 and SHA-512 to lib/crypto/.
Various in-kernel users will be able to use this instead of the
old-school crypto API, which is harder to use and has more overhead.
The basic support added by this commit consists of the API and its
documentation, backed by a C implementation of the algorithms.
sha512_block_generic() is derived from crypto/sha512_generic.c.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250630160320.2888-3-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Fix build warnings with W=1 that started appearing after
commit a934a57a42f6 ("scripts/misc-check: check missing #include
<linux/export.h> when W=1").
While at it, also sort the include lists alphabetically. (Keep
asm/irqflags.h last, as otherwise it doesn't build on alpha.)
This handles all of lib/crypto/, but not arch/*/lib/crypto/. The
exports in arch/*/lib/crypto/ will go away when the code is properly
integrated into lib/crypto/ as planned.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250613184814.50173-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/herbert/crypto-2.6
Pull crypto fixes from Herbert Xu:
"This fixes a regression in ahash (broken fallback finup) and
reinstates a Kconfig option to control the extra self-tests"
* tag 'v6.16-p5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/herbert/crypto-2.6:
crypto: ahash - Fix infinite recursion in ahash_def_finup
crypto: testmgr - reinstate kconfig control over full self-tests
|
|
After commit 6f110a5e4f99 ("Disable SLUB_TINY for build testing"), which
causes CONFIG_KASAN to be enabled in allmodconfig again, arm64
allmodconfig builds with clang-17 and older show an instance of
-Wframe-larger-than (which breaks the build with CONFIG_WERROR=y):
lib/crypto/curve25519-hacl64.c:757:6: error: stack frame size (2336) exceeds limit (2048) in 'curve25519_generic' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than]
757 | void curve25519_generic(u8 mypublic[CURVE25519_KEY_SIZE],
| ^
When KASAN is disabled, the stack usage is roughly quartered:
lib/crypto/curve25519-hacl64.c:757:6: error: stack frame size (608) exceeds limit (128) in 'curve25519_generic' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than]
757 | void curve25519_generic(u8 mypublic[CURVE25519_KEY_SIZE],
| ^
Using '-Rpass-analysis=stack-frame-layout' shows the following variables
and many, many 8-byte spills when KASAN is enabled:
Offset: [SP-144], Type: Variable, Align: 8, Size: 40
Offset: [SP-464], Type: Variable, Align: 8, Size: 320
Offset: [SP-784], Type: Variable, Align: 8, Size: 320
Offset: [SP-864], Type: Variable, Align: 32, Size: 80
Offset: [SP-896], Type: Variable, Align: 32, Size: 32
Offset: [SP-1016], Type: Variable, Align: 8, Size: 120
When KASAN is disabled, there are still spills but not at many and the
variables list is smaller:
Offset: [SP-192], Type: Variable, Align: 32, Size: 80
Offset: [SP-224], Type: Variable, Align: 32, Size: 32
Offset: [SP-344], Type: Variable, Align: 8, Size: 120
Disable KASAN for this file when using clang-17 or older to avoid
blowing out the stack, clearing up the warning.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250609-curve25519-hacl64-disable-kasan-clang-v1-1-08ea0ac5ccff@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
|
