From 169e650069647325496e5a65408ff301874c8e01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kui-Feng Lee Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2024 22:12:04 -0800 Subject: selftests/bpf: Suppress warning message of an unused variable. "r" is used to receive the return value of test_2 in bpf_testmod.c, but it is not actually used. So, we remove "r" and change the return type to "void". Reported-by: kernel test robot Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401300557.z5vzn8FM-lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee Acked-by: Yonghong Song Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240204061204.1864529-1-thinker.li@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h index ca5435751c79..537beca42896 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ struct bpf_iter_testmod_seq { struct bpf_testmod_ops { int (*test_1)(void); - int (*test_2)(int a, int b); + void (*test_2)(int a, int b); }; #endif /* _BPF_TESTMOD_H */ -- cgit v1.2.3 From 00f239eccf461a6403b3c16e767d04f3954cae98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kui-Feng Lee Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 18:37:50 -0800 Subject: selftests/bpf: Test PTR_MAYBE_NULL arguments of struct_ops operators. Test if the verifier verifies nullable pointer arguments correctly for BPF struct_ops programs. "test_maybe_null" in struct bpf_testmod_ops is the operator defined for the test cases here. A BPF program should check a pointer for NULL beforehand to access the value pointed by the nullable pointer arguments, or the verifier should reject the programs. The test here includes two parts; the programs checking pointers properly and the programs not checking pointers beforehand. The test checks if the verifier accepts the programs checking properly and rejects the programs not checking at all. Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240209023750.1153905-5-thinker.li@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau --- .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c | 13 +++++- .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h | 4 ++ .../bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_maybe_null.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++ .../selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_maybe_null.c | 29 ++++++++++++++ .../bpf/progs/struct_ops_maybe_null_fail.c | 24 +++++++++++ 5 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_maybe_null.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_maybe_null.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_maybe_null_fail.c (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c index a06daebc75c9..66787e99ba1b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c @@ -555,7 +555,11 @@ static int bpf_dummy_reg(void *kdata) { struct bpf_testmod_ops *ops = kdata; - ops->test_2(4, 3); + /* Some test cases (ex. struct_ops_maybe_null) may not have test_2 + * initialized, so we need to check for NULL. + */ + if (ops->test_2) + ops->test_2(4, 3); return 0; } @@ -573,9 +577,16 @@ static void bpf_testmod_test_2(int a, int b) { } +static int bpf_testmod_ops__test_maybe_null(int dummy, + struct task_struct *task__nullable) +{ + return 0; +} + static struct bpf_testmod_ops __bpf_testmod_ops = { .test_1 = bpf_testmod_test_1, .test_2 = bpf_testmod_test_2, + .test_maybe_null = bpf_testmod_ops__test_maybe_null, }; struct bpf_struct_ops bpf_bpf_testmod_ops = { diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h index 537beca42896..c3b0cf788f9f 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ #include +struct task_struct; + struct bpf_testmod_test_read_ctx { char *buf; loff_t off; @@ -31,6 +33,8 @@ struct bpf_iter_testmod_seq { struct bpf_testmod_ops { int (*test_1)(void); void (*test_2)(int a, int b); + /* Used to test nullable arguments. */ + int (*test_maybe_null)(int dummy, struct task_struct *task); }; #endif /* _BPF_TESTMOD_H */ diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_maybe_null.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_maybe_null.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..01dc2613c8a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_maybe_null.c @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* Copyright (c) 2024 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */ +#include + +#include "struct_ops_maybe_null.skel.h" +#include "struct_ops_maybe_null_fail.skel.h" + +/* Test that the verifier accepts a program that access a nullable pointer + * with a proper check. + */ +static void maybe_null(void) +{ + struct struct_ops_maybe_null *skel; + + skel = struct_ops_maybe_null__open_and_load(); + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "struct_ops_module_open_and_load")) + return; + + struct_ops_maybe_null__destroy(skel); +} + +/* Test that the verifier rejects a program that access a nullable pointer + * without a check beforehand. + */ +static void maybe_null_fail(void) +{ + struct struct_ops_maybe_null_fail *skel; + + skel = struct_ops_maybe_null_fail__open_and_load(); + if (ASSERT_ERR_PTR(skel, "struct_ops_module_fail__open_and_load")) + return; + + struct_ops_maybe_null_fail__destroy(skel); +} + +void test_struct_ops_maybe_null(void) +{ + /* The verifier verifies the programs at load time, so testing both + * programs in the same compile-unit is complicated. We run them in + * separate objects to simplify the testing. + */ + if (test__start_subtest("maybe_null")) + maybe_null(); + if (test__start_subtest("maybe_null_fail")) + maybe_null_fail(); +} diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_maybe_null.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_maybe_null.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..b450f72e744a --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_maybe_null.c @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* Copyright (c) 2024 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */ +#include +#include +#include "../bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h" + +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; + +pid_t tgid = 0; + +/* This is a test BPF program that uses struct_ops to access an argument + * that may be NULL. This is a test for the verifier to ensure that it can + * rip PTR_MAYBE_NULL correctly. + */ +SEC("struct_ops/test_maybe_null") +int BPF_PROG(test_maybe_null, int dummy, + struct task_struct *task) +{ + if (task) + tgid = task->tgid; + + return 0; +} + +SEC(".struct_ops.link") +struct bpf_testmod_ops testmod_1 = { + .test_maybe_null = (void *)test_maybe_null, +}; + diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_maybe_null_fail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_maybe_null_fail.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..6283099ec383 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_maybe_null_fail.c @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* Copyright (c) 2024 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */ +#include +#include +#include "../bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h" + +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; + +pid_t tgid = 0; + +SEC("struct_ops/test_maybe_null_struct_ptr") +int BPF_PROG(test_maybe_null_struct_ptr, int dummy, + struct task_struct *task) +{ + tgid = task->tgid; + + return 0; +} + +SEC(".struct_ops.link") +struct bpf_testmod_ops testmod_struct_ptr = { + .test_maybe_null = (void *)test_maybe_null_struct_ptr, +}; + -- cgit v1.2.3 From 0623e73317940d052216fb6eef4efd55a0a7f602 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kui-Feng Lee Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 22:45:23 -0800 Subject: selftests/bpf: Test if shadow types work correctly. Change the values of fields, including scalar types and function pointers, and check if the struct_ops map works as expected. The test changes the field "test_2" of "testmod_1" from the pointer to test_2() to pointer to test_3() and the field "data" to 13. The function test_2() and test_3() both compute a new value for "test_2_result", but in different way. By checking the value of "test_2_result", it ensures the struct_ops map works as expected with changes through shadow types. Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240229064523.2091270-6-thinker.li@gmail.com --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c | 11 ++++++++++- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h | 8 ++++++++ .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c | 19 +++++++++++++++---- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c | 8 ++++++++ 4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c index 66787e99ba1b..098ddd067224 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c @@ -539,6 +539,15 @@ static int bpf_testmod_ops_init_member(const struct btf_type *t, const struct btf_member *member, void *kdata, const void *udata) { + if (member->offset == offsetof(struct bpf_testmod_ops, data) * 8) { + /* For data fields, this function has to copy it and return + * 1 to indicate that the data has been handled by the + * struct_ops type, or the verifier will reject the map if + * the value of the data field is not zero. + */ + ((struct bpf_testmod_ops *)kdata)->data = ((struct bpf_testmod_ops *)udata)->data; + return 1; + } return 0; } @@ -559,7 +568,7 @@ static int bpf_dummy_reg(void *kdata) * initialized, so we need to check for NULL. */ if (ops->test_2) - ops->test_2(4, 3); + ops->test_2(4, ops->data); return 0; } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h index c3b0cf788f9f..971458acfac3 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h @@ -35,6 +35,14 @@ struct bpf_testmod_ops { void (*test_2)(int a, int b); /* Used to test nullable arguments. */ int (*test_maybe_null)(int dummy, struct task_struct *task); + + /* The following fields are used to test shadow copies. */ + char onebyte; + struct { + int a; + int b; + } unsupported; + int data; }; #endif /* _BPF_TESTMOD_H */ diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c index 8d833f0c7580..7d6facf46ebb 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_module.c @@ -32,17 +32,23 @@ cleanup: static void test_struct_ops_load(void) { - DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts); struct struct_ops_module *skel; struct bpf_map_info info = {}; struct bpf_link *link; int err; u32 len; - skel = struct_ops_module__open_opts(&opts); + skel = struct_ops_module__open(); if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "struct_ops_module_open")) return; + skel->struct_ops.testmod_1->data = 13; + skel->struct_ops.testmod_1->test_2 = skel->progs.test_3; + /* Since test_2() is not being used, it should be disabled from + * auto-loading, or it will fail to load. + */ + bpf_program__set_autoload(skel->progs.test_2, false); + err = struct_ops_module__load(skel); if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "struct_ops_module_load")) goto cleanup; @@ -56,8 +62,13 @@ static void test_struct_ops_load(void) link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.testmod_1); ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_test_mod_1"); - /* test_2() will be called from bpf_dummy_reg() in bpf_testmod.c */ - ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_2_result, 7, "test_2_result"); + /* test_3() will be called from bpf_dummy_reg() in bpf_testmod.c + * + * In bpf_testmod.c it will pass 4 and 13 (the value of data) to + * .test_2. So, the value of test_2_result should be 20 (4 + 13 + + * 3). + */ + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_2_result, 20, "check_shadow_variables"); bpf_link__destroy(link); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c index b78746b3cef3..25952fa09348 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_module.c @@ -21,9 +21,17 @@ void BPF_PROG(test_2, int a, int b) test_2_result = a + b; } +SEC("struct_ops/test_3") +int BPF_PROG(test_3, int a, int b) +{ + test_2_result = a + b + 3; + return a + b + 3; +} + SEC(".struct_ops.link") struct bpf_testmod_ops testmod_1 = { .test_1 = (void *)test_1, .test_2 = (void *)test_2, + .data = 0x1, }; -- cgit v1.2.3