From 3f23ee5590d9605dbde9a5e1d4b97637a4803329 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eduard Zingerman Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 20:10:56 -0800 Subject: selftests/bpf: test for changing packet data from global functions Check if verifier is aware of packet pointers invalidation done in global functions. Based on a test shared by Nick Zavaritsky in [0]. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/0498CA22-5779-4767-9C0C-A9515CEA711F@gmail.com/ Suggested-by: Nick Zavaritsky Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241210041100.1898468-5-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_sock.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_sock.c') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_sock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_sock.c index d3e70e38e442..51826379a1aa 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_sock.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_sock.c @@ -1037,4 +1037,32 @@ __naked void sock_create_read_src_port(void) : __clobber_all); } +__noinline +long skb_pull_data2(struct __sk_buff *sk, __u32 len) +{ + return bpf_skb_pull_data(sk, len); +} + +__noinline +long skb_pull_data1(struct __sk_buff *sk, __u32 len) +{ + return skb_pull_data2(sk, len); +} + +/* global function calls bpf_skb_pull_data(), which invalidates packet + * pointers established before global function call. + */ +SEC("tc") +__failure __msg("invalid mem access") +int invalidate_pkt_pointers_from_global_func(struct __sk_buff *sk) +{ + int *p = (void *)(long)sk->data; + + if ((void *)(p + 1) > (void *)(long)sk->data_end) + return TCX_DROP; + skb_pull_data1(sk, 0); + *p = 42; /* this is unsafe */ + return TCX_PASS; +} + char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; -- cgit v1.2.3 From d9706b56e13b7916461ca6b4b731e169ed44ed09 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eduard Zingerman Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 20:11:00 -0800 Subject: selftests/bpf: validate that tail call invalidates packet pointers Add a test case with a tail call done from a global sub-program. Such tails calls should be considered as invalidating packet pointers. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241210041100.1898468-9-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_sock.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_sock.c') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_sock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_sock.c index 51826379a1aa..0d5e56dffabb 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_sock.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_sock.c @@ -50,6 +50,13 @@ struct { __uint(map_flags, BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC); } sk_storage_map SEC(".maps"); +struct { + __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY); + __uint(max_entries, 1); + __uint(key_size, sizeof(__u32)); + __uint(value_size, sizeof(__u32)); +} jmp_table SEC(".maps"); + SEC("cgroup/skb") __description("skb->sk: no NULL check") __failure __msg("invalid mem access 'sock_common_or_null'") @@ -1065,4 +1072,25 @@ int invalidate_pkt_pointers_from_global_func(struct __sk_buff *sk) return TCX_PASS; } +__noinline +int tail_call(struct __sk_buff *sk) +{ + bpf_tail_call_static(sk, &jmp_table, 0); + return 0; +} + +/* Tail calls invalidate packet pointers. */ +SEC("tc") +__failure __msg("invalid mem access") +int invalidate_pkt_pointers_by_tail_call(struct __sk_buff *sk) +{ + int *p = (void *)(long)sk->data; + + if ((void *)(p + 1) > (void *)(long)sk->data_end) + return TCX_DROP; + tail_call(sk); + *p = 42; /* this is unsafe */ + return TCX_PASS; +} + char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; -- cgit v1.2.3