diff options
| author | Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> | 2006-10-29 00:47:56 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> | 2006-10-29 00:49:17 -0700 |
| commit | c7740a943ec896247ebc5514b6be02710caf3c53 (patch) | |
| tree | ab918e6d34d35d714a180f57e946afdc81aa0a57 /builtin-unpack-objects.c | |
| parent | index-pack: minor fixes to comment and function name (diff) | |
| download | git-c7740a943ec896247ebc5514b6be02710caf3c53.tar.gz git-c7740a943ec896247ebc5514b6be02710caf3c53.zip | |
send-pack --keep: do not explode into loose objects on the receiving end.
This adds "keep-pack" extension to send-pack vs receive pack protocol,
and makes the receiver invoke "index-pack --stdin --fix-thin".
With this, you can ask send-pack not to explode the result into
loose objects on the receiving end.
I've patched has_sha1_file() to re-check for added packs just
like is done in read_sha1_file() for now, but I think the static
"re-prepare" interface for packs was a mistake. Creation of a
new pack inside a process that needs to read objects in them
back ought to be a rare event, so we are better off making the
callers (such as receive-pack that calls "index-pack --stdin
--fix-thin") explicitly call re-prepare. That way we do not
have to penalize ordinary users of read_sha1_file() and
has_sha1_file().
We would need to fix this someday.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'builtin-unpack-objects.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
