diff options
| author | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2024-03-12 09:49:52 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2024-03-12 09:55:57 +0100 |
| commit | 2e2bc42c8381d2c0e9604b59e49264821da29368 (patch) | |
| tree | c158510b5e7942b3a0d6eb6807cbeacf96035798 /kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c | |
| parent | x86/sev: Move early startup code into .head.text section (diff) | |
| parent | Merge tag 'x86_tdx_for_6.9' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/... (diff) | |
| download | linux-2e2bc42c8381d2c0e9604b59e49264821da29368.tar.gz linux-2e2bc42c8381d2c0e9604b59e49264821da29368.zip | |
Merge branch 'linus' into x86/boot, to resolve conflict
There's a new conflict with Linus's upstream tree, because
in the following merge conflict resolution in <asm/coco.h>:
38b334fc767e Merge tag 'x86_sev_for_v6.9_rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Linus has resolved the conflicting placement of 'cc_mask' better
than the original commit:
1c811d403afd x86/sev: Fix position dependent variable references in startup code
... which was also done by an internal merge resolution:
2e5fc4786b7a Merge branch 'x86/sev' into x86/boot, to resolve conflicts and to pick up dependent tree
But Linus is right in 38b334fc767e, the 'cc_mask' declaration is sufficient
within the #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CC_PLATFORM block.
So instead of forcing Linus to do the same resolution again, merge in Linus's
tree and follow his conflict resolution.
Conflicts:
arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c b/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c index ffdb30495e3c..8db4fedaaa1e 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c +++ b/kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c @@ -764,9 +764,9 @@ kfree_scale_init(void) if (kfree_by_call_rcu) { /* do a test to check the timeout. */ - orig_jif = rcu_lazy_get_jiffies_till_flush(); + orig_jif = rcu_get_jiffies_lazy_flush(); - rcu_lazy_set_jiffies_till_flush(2 * HZ); + rcu_set_jiffies_lazy_flush(2 * HZ); rcu_barrier(); jif_start = jiffies; @@ -775,7 +775,7 @@ kfree_scale_init(void) smp_cond_load_relaxed(&rcu_lazy_test1_cb_called, VAL == 1); - rcu_lazy_set_jiffies_till_flush(orig_jif); + rcu_set_jiffies_lazy_flush(orig_jif); if (WARN_ON_ONCE(jiffies_at_lazy_cb - jif_start < 2 * HZ)) { pr_alert("ERROR: call_rcu() CBs are not being lazy as expected!\n"); |