summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/rust/pin-init
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2026-02-22Merge tag 'rust-fixes-7.0' of ↵Linus Torvalds-2/+2
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ojeda/linux Pull rust fixes from Miguel Ojeda: "Toolchain and infrastructure: - Pass '-Zunstable-options' flag required by the future Rust 1.95.0 - Fix 'objtool' warning for Rust 1.84.0 'kernel' crate: - 'irq' module: add missing bound detected by the future Rust 1.95.0 - 'list' module: add missing 'unsafe' blocks and placeholder safety comments to macros (an issue for future callers within the crate) 'pin-init' crate: - Clean Clippy warning that changed behavior in the future Rust 1.95.0" * tag 'rust-fixes-7.0' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ojeda/linux: rust: list: Add unsafe blocks for container_of and safety comments rust: pin-init: replace clippy `expect` with `allow` rust: irq: add `'static` bounds to irq callbacks objtool/rust: add one more `noreturn` Rust function rust: kbuild: pass `-Zunstable-options` for Rust 1.95.0
2026-02-19rust: pin-init: replace clippy `expect` with `allow`Benno Lossin-2/+2
`clippy` has changed behavior in [1] (Rust 1.95) where it no longer warns about the `let_and_return` lint when a comment is placed between the let binding and the return expression. Nightly thus fails to build, because the expectation is no longer fulfilled. Thus replace the expectation with an `allow`. [ The errors were: error: this lint expectation is unfulfilled --> rust/pin-init/src/lib.rs:1279:10 | 1279 | #[expect(clippy::let_and_return)] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | = note: `-D unfulfilled-lint-expectations` implied by `-D warnings` = help: to override `-D warnings` add `#[allow(unfulfilled_lint_expectations)]` error: this lint expectation is unfulfilled --> rust/pin-init/src/lib.rs:1295:10 | 1295 | #[expect(clippy::let_and_return)] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ - Miguel ] Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/16461 [1] Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # Needed in 6.18.y and later. Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260215132232.1549861-1-lossin@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2026-01-17rust: pin-init: Implement `InPlaceWrite<T>` for `&'static mut MaybeUninit<T>`Oleksandr Babak-0/+27
This feature allows users to use `&'static mut MaybeUninit<T>` as a place to initialize the value. It mirrors an existing implemetation for `Box<MaybeUninit>`, but enables users to use external allocation mechanisms such as `static_cell` [1]. Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Babak <alexanderbabak@proton.me> Link: https://crates.io/crates/static_cell [1] [ Added link to `static_cell` - Benno ] Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
2026-01-17rust: pin-init: internal: init: simplify Zeroable safety checkBenno Lossin-6/+1
The `Zeroable` type check uses a small dance with a raw pointer to aid type inference. It turns out that this is not necessary and type inference is powerful enough to resolve any ambiguity. Thus remove it. Suggested-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Tested-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
2026-01-17rust: pin-init: internal: init: add escape hatch for referencing initialized ↵Benno Lossin-23/+52
fields The initializer macro emits mutable references for already initialized fields, which allows modifying or accessing them later in code blocks or when initializing other fields. This behavior results in compiler errors when combining with packed structs, since those do not permit creating references to misaligned fields. For example: #[repr(C, packed)] struct Foo { a: i8, b: i32, } fn main() { let _ = init!(Foo { a: -42, b: 42 }); } This will lead to an error like this: error[E0793]: reference to field of packed struct is unaligned --> tests/ui/compile-fail/init/packed_struct.rs:10:13 | 10 | let _ = init!(Foo { a: -42, b: 42 }); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | = note: this struct is 1-byte aligned, but the type of this field may require higher alignment = note: creating a misaligned reference is undefined behavior (even if that reference is never dereferenced) = help: copy the field contents to a local variable, or replace the reference with a raw pointer and use `read_unaligned`/`write_unaligned` (loads and stores via `*p` must be properly aligned even when using raw pointers) = note: this error originates in the macro `init` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) This was requested by Janne Grunau [1] and will most certainly be used by the kernel when we eventually end up with trying to initialize packed structs. Thus add an initializer attribute `#[disable_initialized_field_access]` that does what the name suggests: do not generate references to already initialized fields. There is space for future work: add yet another attribute which can be applied on fields of initializers that ask for said field to be made accessible. We can add that when the need arises. Requested-by: Janne Grunau <j@jannau.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251206170214.GE1097212@robin.jannau.net [1] Tested-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
2026-01-17rust: pin-init: internal: init: add support for attributes on initializer fieldsBenno Lossin-14/+55
Initializer fields ought to support the same attributes that are allowed in struct initializers on fields. For example, `cfg` or lint levels such as `expect`, `allow` etc. Add parsing support for these attributes using syn to initializer fields and adjust the macro expansion accordingly. Tested-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
2026-01-17rust: pin-init: add `#[default_error(<type>)]` attribute to initializer macrosBenno Lossin-3/+41
The `#[default_error(<type>)]` attribute can be used to supply a default type as the error used for the `[pin_]init!` macros. This way one can easily define custom `try_[pin_]init!` variants that default to your project specific error type. Just write the following declarative macro: macro_rules! try_init { ($($args:tt)*) => { ::pin_init::init!( #[default_error(YourCustomErrorType)] $($args)* ) } } Tested-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
2026-01-17rust: pin-init: rewrite the initializer macros using `syn`Benno Lossin-1005/+460
Rewrite the initializer macros `[pin_]init!` using `syn`. No functional changes intended aside from improved error messages on syntactic and semantical errors. For example if one forgets to use `<-` with an initializer (and instead uses `:`): impl Bar { fn new() -> impl PinInit<Self> { ... } } impl Foo { fn new() -> impl PinInit<Self> { pin_init!(Self { bar: Bar::new() }) } } Then the declarative macro would report: error[E0308]: mismatched types --> tests/ui/compile-fail/init/colon_instead_of_arrow.rs:21:9 | 14 | fn new() -> impl PinInit<Self> { | ------------------ the found opaque type ... 21 | pin_init!(Self { bar: Bar::new() }) | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | | | expected `Bar`, found opaque type | arguments to this function are incorrect | = note: expected struct `Bar` found opaque type `impl pin_init::PinInit<Bar>` note: function defined here --> $RUST/core/src/ptr/mod.rs | | pub const unsafe fn write<T>(dst: *mut T, src: T) { | ^^^^^ = note: this error originates in the macro `$crate::__init_internal` which comes from the expansion of the macro `pin_init` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) And the new error is: error[E0308]: mismatched types --> tests/ui/compile-fail/init/colon_instead_of_arrow.rs:21:31 | 14 | fn new() -> impl PinInit<Self> { | ------------------ the found opaque type ... 21 | pin_init!(Self { bar: Bar::new() }) | --- ^^^^^^^^^^ expected `Bar`, found opaque type | | | arguments to this function are incorrect | = note: expected struct `Bar` found opaque type `impl pin_init::PinInit<Bar>` note: function defined here --> $RUST/core/src/ptr/mod.rs | | pub const unsafe fn write<T>(dst: *mut T, src: T) { | ^^^^^ Importantly, this error gives much more accurate span locations, pointing to the offending field, rather than the entire macro invocation. Tested-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
2026-01-17rust: pin-init: add `?Sized` bounds to traits in `#[pin_data]` macroBenno Lossin-2/+2
The `#[pin_data]` macro uses some auxiliary traits to ensure that a user does not implement `Drop` for the annotated struct, as that is unsound and can lead to UB. However, if the struct that is annotated is `!Sized`, the current bounds do not work, because `Sized` is an implicit bound for generics. This is *not* a soundness hole of pin-init, as it currently is impossible to construct an unsized struct using pin-init. Tested-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
2026-01-17rust: pin-init: rewrite `#[pin_data]` using `syn`Benno Lossin-838/+503
Rewrite the attribute macro `#[pin_data]` using `syn`. No functional changes intended aside from improved error messages on syntactic and semantical errors. For example if one forgets a comma at the end of a field: #[pin_data] struct Foo { a: Box<Foo> b: Box<Foo> } The declarative macro reports the following errors: error: expected `,`, or `}`, found `b` --> tests/ui/compile-fail/pin_data/missing_comma.rs:5:16 | 5 | a: Box<Foo> | ^ help: try adding a comma: `,` error: recursion limit reached while expanding `$crate::__pin_data!` --> tests/ui/compile-fail/pin_data/missing_comma.rs:3:1 | 3 | #[pin_data] | ^^^^^^^^^^^ | = help: consider increasing the recursion limit by adding a `#![recursion_limit = "256"]` attribute to your crate (`$CRATE`) = note: this error originates in the macro `$crate::__pin_data` which comes from the expansion of the attribute macro `pin_data` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) The new `syn` version reports: error: expected `,`, or `}`, found `b` --> tests/ui/compile-fail/pin_data/missing_comma.rs:5:16 | 5 | a: Box<Foo> | ^ help: try adding a comma: `,` error: expected `,` --> tests/ui/compile-fail/pin_data/missing_comma.rs:6:5 | 6 | b: Box<Foo> | ^ Tested-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
2026-01-17rust: pin-init: rewrite the `#[pinned_drop]` attribute macro using `syn`Benno Lossin-66/+52
Rewrite the attribute macro for implementing `PinnedDrop` using `syn`. Otherwise no functional changes intended aside from improved error messages on syntactic and semantical errors. For example: When missing the `drop` function in the implementation, the old error was: error: no rules expected `)` --> tests/ui/compile-fail/pinned_drop/no_fn.rs:6:1 | 6 | #[pinned_drop] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ no rules expected this token in macro call | note: while trying to match keyword `fn` --> src/macros.rs | | fn drop($($sig:tt)*) { | ^^ = note: this error originates in the attribute macro `pinned_drop` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) And the new one is: error[E0046]: not all trait items implemented, missing: `drop` --> tests/ui/compile-fail/pinned_drop/no_fn.rs:7:1 | 7 | impl PinnedDrop for Foo {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ missing `drop` in implementation | = help: implement the missing item: `fn drop(self: Pin<&mut Self>, _: OnlyCallFromDrop) { todo!() }` Tested-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
2026-01-17rust: pin-init: rewrite `derive(Zeroable)` and `derive(MaybeZeroable)` using ↵Benno Lossin-216/+74
`syn` Rewrite the two derive macros for `Zeroable` using `syn`. One positive side effect of this change is that tuple structs are now supported by them. Additionally, syntax errors and the error emitted when trying to use one of the derive macros on an `enum` are improved. Otherwise no functional changes intended. For example: #[derive(Zeroable)] enum Num { A(u32), B(i32), } Produced this error before this commit: error: no rules expected keyword `enum` --> tests/ui/compile-fail/zeroable/enum.rs:5:1 | 5 | enum Num { | ^^^^ no rules expected this token in macro call | note: while trying to match keyword `struct` --> src/macros.rs | | $vis:vis struct $name:ident | ^^^^^^ Now the error is: error: cannot derive `Zeroable` for an enum --> tests/ui/compile-fail/zeroable/enum.rs:5:1 | 5 | enum Num { | ^^^^ error: cannot derive `Zeroable` for an enum Tested-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
2026-01-17rust: pin-init: internal: add utility API for syn error handlingBenno Lossin-0/+33
The API is similar to diagnostics handling in rustc and uses a `ErrorGuaranteed` value to signify that an error has been emitted. It supports both fatal errors (which abort the macro expansion immediately by returning `Err(ErrorGuaranteed)`) and non-fatal ones at generation time. These errors are appended to the token stream after generation has finished normally. This allows giving good errors while still expanding most of the code as expected to avoid the user encountering additional errors (for example missing definitions). Suggested-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Tested-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> [ remove duplicate word in commit message - Benno ] Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
2026-01-17rust: pin-init: add `syn` dependency and remove `proc-macro[2]` and `quote` ↵Benno Lossin-43/+14
workarounds `syn` makes parsing Rust from proc-macros a lot simpler. `pin-init` has not used `syn` up until now, because the we did not support it. That changed in commit 54e3eae85562 ("Merge patch series "`syn` support""), so we can finally utilize the added ergonomics of parsing proc-macro input with `syn`. Previously we only had the `proc-macro` library available, whereas the user-space version also used `proc-macro2` and `quote`. Now both are available, so remove the workarounds. Due to these changes, clippy emits warnings about unnecessary `.to_string()` as `proc-macro2` provides an additional `PartialEq` impl on `Ident`, so the warnings are fixed. [ Adjusted wording from upstream version and added build system changes for the kernel - Benno ] Co-developed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Tested-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
2026-01-17rust: pin-init: allow the crate to refer to itself as `pin-init` in doc testsBenno Lossin-0/+5
The `syn` approach requires use of `::pin_init::...` instead of the `$crate::...` construct available to declarative macros. To be able to use the `pin_init` crate from itself (which includes doc tests), we have to declare it as such. Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Tested-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
2026-01-17rust: pin-init: remove `try_` versions of the initializer macrosBenno Lossin-118/+31
The `try_[pin_]init!` versions of the initializer macros are superfluous. Instead of forcing the user to always write an error in `try_[pin_]init!` and not allowing one in `[pin_]init!`, combine them into `[pin_]init!` that defaults the error to `core::convert::Infallible`, but also allows to specify a custom one. Projects using pin-init still can provide their own defaulting initializers using the `try_` prefix by using the `#[default_error]` attribute added in a future patch. [ Adjust the definition of the kernel's version of the `try_` initializer macros - Benno] Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Tested-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
2025-12-05Merge tag 'driver-core-6.19-rc1' of ↵Linus Torvalds-0/+87
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/driver-core/driver-core Pull driver core updates from Danilo Krummrich: "Arch Topology: - Move parse_acpi_topology() from arm64 to common code for reuse in RISC-V CPU: - Expose housekeeping CPUs through /sys/devices/system/cpu/housekeeping - Print a newline (or 0x0A) instead of '(null)' reading /sys/devices/system/cpu/nohz_full when nohz_full= is not set debugfs - Remove (broken) 'no-mount' mode - Remove redundant access mode checks in debugfs_get_tree() and debugfs_create_*() functions Devres: - Remove unused devm_free_percpu() helper - Move devm_alloc_percpu() from device.h to devres.h Firmware Loader: - Replace simple_strtol() with kstrtoint() - Do not call cancel_store() when no upload is in progress kernfs: - Increase struct super_block::maxbytes to MAX_LFS_FILESIZE - Fix a missing unwind path in __kernfs_new_node() Misc: - Increase the name size in struct auxiliary_device_id to 40 characters - Replace system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq and add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue() Platform: - Replace ERR_PTR() with IOMEM_ERR_PTR() in platform ioremap functions Rust: - Auxiliary: - Unregister auxiliary device on parent device unbind - Move parent() to impl Device; implement device context aware parent() for Device<Bound> - Illustrate how to safely obtain a driver's device private data when calling from an auxiliary driver into the parant device driver - DebugFs: - Implement support for binary large objects - Device: - Let probe() return the driver's device private data as pinned initializer, i.e. impl PinInit<Self, Error> - Implement safe accessor for a driver's device private data for Device<Bound> (returned reference can't out-live driver binding and guarantees the correct private data type) - Implement AsBusDevice trait, to be used by class device abstractions to derive the bus device type of the parent device - DMA: - Store raw pointer of allocation as NonNull - Use start_ptr() and start_ptr_mut() to inherit correct mutability of self - FS: - Add file::Offset type alias - I2C: - Add abstractions for I2C device / driver infrastructure - Implement abstractions for manual I2C device registrations - I/O: - Use "kernel vertical" style for imports - Define ResourceSize as resource_size_t - Move ResourceSize to top-level I/O module - Add type alias for phys_addr_t - Implement Rust version of read_poll_timeout_atomic() - PCI: - Use "kernel vertical" style for imports - Move I/O and IRQ infrastructure to separate files - Add support for PCI interrupt vectors - Implement TryInto<IrqRequest<'a>> for IrqVector<'a> to convert an IrqVector bound to specific pci::Device into an IrqRequest bound to the same pci::Device's parent Device - Leverage pin_init_scope() to get rid of redundant Result in IRQ methods - PinInit: - Add {pin_}init_scope() to execute code before creating an initializer - Platform: - Leverage pin_init_scope() to get rid of redundant Result in IRQ methods - Timekeeping: - Implement abstraction of udelay() - Uaccess: - Implement read_slice_partial() and read_slice_file() for UserSliceReader - Implement write_slice_partial() and write_slice_file() for UserSliceWriter sysfs: - Prepare the constification of struct attribute" * tag 'driver-core-6.19-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/driver-core/driver-core: (75 commits) rust: pci: fix build failure when CONFIG_PCI_MSI is disabled debugfs: Fix default access mode config check debugfs: Remove broken no-mount mode debugfs: Remove redundant access mode checks driver core: Check drivers_autoprobe for all added devices driver core: WQ_PERCPU added to alloc_workqueue users driver core: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq tick/nohz: Expose housekeeping CPUs in sysfs tick/nohz: avoid showing '(null)' if nohz_full= not set sysfs/cpu: Use DEVICE_ATTR_RO for nohz_full attribute kernfs: fix memory leak of kernfs_iattrs in __kernfs_new_node fs/kernfs: raise sb->maxbytes to MAX_LFS_FILESIZE mod_devicetable: Bump auxiliary_device_id name size sysfs: simplify attribute definition macros samples/kobject: constify 'struct foo_attribute' samples/kobject: add is_visible() callback to attribute group sysfs: attribute_group: enable const variants of is_visible() sysfs: introduce __SYSFS_FUNCTION_ALTERNATIVE() sysfs: transparently handle const pointers in ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS() sysfs: attribute_group: allow registration of const attribute ...
2025-11-19rust: pin-init: fix typo in docsBrian Harring-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Brian Harring <ferringb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251016211740.653599-2-lossin@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2025-11-19rust: pin-init: fix broken rust doc linkBenno Lossin-0/+2
Rust 1.92.0 warns when building the documentation that [`PinnedDrop`] is an invalid reference. This is correct and it's weird that it didn't warn before, so fix the link. [ The reason is that it is hidden -- I had asked about that in the upstream PR that changed the behavior because I wasn't sure it was intentional (and thus whether we needed to fix this and other cases): https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/147153#issuecomment-3395484636 It turns out it was not, and it has been fixed for 1.92.0's upcoming release thanks to Guillaume and León. So we do not strictly need this patch and the other changes anymore: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/147809 However, checking hidden/private items or, even better, a runtime toggle to be able to see those on the fly, is something that I think would be quite nice so I have had it in our usual lists for a while. Guillaume is open to the idea and perhaps experimenting with an implementation on our side first -- he asked me to open issues upstream: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/149105 https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/149106 - Miguel ] Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251016211740.653599-1-lossin@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2025-10-21add `[pin_]init_scope` to execute code before creating an initializerBenno Lossin-0/+87
In more complex cases, initializers need to run arbitrary code before assigning initializers to fields. While this is possible using the underscore codeblock feature (`_: {}`), values returned by such functions cannot be used from later field initializers. The two new functions `[pin_]init_scope` allow users to first run some fallible code and then return an initializer which the function turns into a single initializer. This permits using the same value multiple times by different fields. Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> [ Fix typo in commit message: s/functinos/functions/. - Danilo ] Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
2025-09-11rust: pin-init: add references to previously initialized fieldsBenno Lossin-34/+115
After initializing a field in an initializer macro, create a variable holding a reference that points at that field. The type is either `Pin<&mut T>` or `&mut T` depending on the field's structural pinning kind. [ Applied fixes to devres and rust_driver_pci sample - Benno] Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
2025-09-11rust: pin-init: add code blocks to `[try_][pin_]init!` macrosBenno Lossin-0/+31
Allow writing `_: { /* any number of statements */ }` in initializers to run arbitrary code during initialization. try_init!(MyStruct { _: { if check_something() { return Err(MyError); } }, foo: Foo::new(val), _: { println!("successfully initialized `MyStruct`"); }, }) Tested-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Tested-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
2025-09-11rust: pin-init: add pin projections to `#[pin_data]`Benno Lossin-0/+61
Make the `#[pin_data]` macro generate a `*Projection` struct that holds either `Pin<&mut Field>` or `&mut Field` for every field of the original struct. Which version is chosen depends on weather there is a `#[pin]` or not respectively. Access to this projected version is enabled through generating `fn project(self: Pin<&mut Self>) -> SelfProjection<'_>`. [ Adapt workqueue to use the new projection instead of its own, custom one - Benno ] Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
2025-09-11rust: pin-init: rename `project` -> `project_this` in doctestBenno Lossin-1/+1
The next commit makes the `#[pin_data]` attribute generate a `project` function that would collide with any existing ones. Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
2025-09-11rust: pin-init: README: add information banner on the rename to `pin-init`Benno Lossin-0/+12
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
2025-09-11rust: pin-init: examples: error: use `Error` in `fn main()`Benno Lossin-1/+3
When running this example with no cargo features enabled, the compiler warns on 1.89: error: struct `Error` is never constructed --> examples/error.rs:11:12 | 11 | pub struct Error; | ^^^^^ | = note: `-D dead-code` implied by `-D warnings` = help: to override `-D warnings` add `#[allow(dead_code)]` Thus use the error in the main function to avoid this warning. Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
2025-07-13Merge tag 'pin-init-v6.17' of https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux into ↵Miguel Ojeda-123/+268
rust-next Pull pin-init updates from Benno Lossin: "Added: - 'impl<T, E> [Pin]Init<T, E> for Result<T, E>', so results are now (pin-)initializers. - 'Zeroable::init_zeroed()' delegating to 'init_zeroed()'. - New 'zeroed()', a safe version of 'mem::zeroed()' and also provide it via 'Zeroable::zeroed()'. - Implement 'Zeroable' for 'Option<&T>' and 'Option<&mut T>'. - Implement 'Zeroable' for 'Option<[unsafe] [extern "abi"] fn(...args...) -> ret>' for '"Rust"' and '"C"' ABIs and up to 20 arguments. Changed: - Blanket impls of 'Init' and 'PinInit' from 'impl<T, E> [Pin]Init<T, E> for T' to 'impl<T> [Pin]Init<T> for T'. - Renamed 'zeroed()' to 'init_zeroed()'. Upstream dev news: - More CI improvements to deny warnings, use '--all-targets'. Also check the synchronization status of the two '-next' branches in upstream and the kernel." Acked-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org> * tag 'pin-init-v6.17' of https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux: rust: pin-init: examples, tests: use `ignore` instead of conditionally compiling tests rust: init: remove doctest's `Error::from_errno` workaround rust: init: re-enable doctests rust: pin-init: implement `ZeroableOption` for function pointers with up to 20 arguments rust: pin-init: change `impl Zeroable for Option<NonNull<T>>` to `ZeroableOption for NonNull<T>` rust: pin-init: implement `ZeroableOption` for `&T` and `&mut T` rust: pin-init: add `zeroed()` & `Zeroable::zeroed()` functions rust: pin-init: add `Zeroable::init_zeroed` rust: pin-init: rename `zeroed` to `init_zeroed` rust: pin-init: feature-gate the `stack_init_reuse` test on the `std` feature rust: pin-init: examples: pthread_mutex: disable the main test for miri rust: pin-init: examples, tests: add conditional compilation in order to compile under any feature combination rust: pin-init: change blanket impls for `[Pin]Init` and add one for `Result<T, E>` rust: pin-init: improve safety documentation for `impl<T> [Pin]Init<T> for T`
2025-06-24rust: Use consistent "# Examples" heading style in rustdocViresh Kumar-1/+1
Use a consistent `# Examples` heading in rustdoc across the codebase. Some modules previously used `## Examples` (even when they should be available as top-level headers), while others used `# Example`, which deviates from the preferred `# Examples` style. Suggested-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ddd5ce0ac20c99a72a4f1e4322d3de3911056922.1749545815.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2025-06-11rust: pin-init: examples, tests: use `ignore` instead of conditionally ↵Benno Lossin-1/+2
compiling tests Change `#[cfg(cond)]` to `#[cfg_attr(not(cond), ignore)]` on tests. Ignoring tests instead of disabling them still makes them appear in the test list, but with `ignored`. It also still compiles the code in those cases. Some tests still need to be ignore, because they use types that are not present when the condition is false. For example the condition is `feature = std` and then it uses `std::thread::Thread`. Suggested-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aDC9y829vZZBzZ2p@google.com Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/pin-init/pull/58/commits/b004dd8e64d4cbe219a4eff0d25f0a5f5bc750ca Reviewed-by: Christian Schrefl <chrisi.schrefl@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250605155258.573391-1-lossin@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
2025-06-11rust: pin-init: implement `ZeroableOption` for function pointers with up to ↵Benno Lossin-0/+16
20 arguments `Option<[unsafe] [extern "abi"] fn(...args...) -> ret>` is documented [1] to also have the `None` variant equal all zeroes. Link: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/option/index.html#representation [1] Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/pin-init/pull/56/commits/b6c1ab4fb3699765f81ae512ecac5a2f032d8d51 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250523145125.523275-7-lossin@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
2025-06-11rust: pin-init: change `impl Zeroable for Option<NonNull<T>>` to ↵Benno Lossin-1/+3
`ZeroableOption for NonNull<T>` This brings it in line with references. It too is listed in [1]. Link: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/option/index.html#representation Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/pin-init/pull/56/commits/8e52bf56ddc2190ce901d2f7c008ab8a64f653a9 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250523145125.523275-6-lossin@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
2025-06-11rust: pin-init: implement `ZeroableOption` for `&T` and `&mut T`Benno Lossin-0/+7
`Option<&T>` and `Option<&mut T>` are documented [1] to have the `None` variant be all zeroes. Link: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/option/index.html#representation [1] Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/pin-init/pull/56/commits/5ef1638c79e019d3dc0c62db5905601644c2e60a Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250523145125.523275-5-lossin@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
2025-06-11rust: pin-init: add `zeroed()` & `Zeroable::zeroed()` functionsBenno Lossin-0/+52
`zeroed()` returns a zeroed out value of a sized type implementing `Zeroable`. The function is added as a free standing function, in addition to an associated function on `Zeroable`, because then it can be marked `const` (functions in traits can't be const at the moment). Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/pin-init/pull/56/commits/809e4ec160579c1601dce5d78b432a5b6c8e4e40 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250523145125.523275-4-lossin@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
2025-06-11rust: pin-init: add `Zeroable::init_zeroed`Benno Lossin-1/+12
The trait function delegates to the already existing `init_zeroed` function that returns a zeroing initializer for `Self`. The syntax `..Zeroable::init_zeroed()` is already used by the initialization macros to initialize all fields that are not mentioned in the initializer with zero. Therefore it is expected that the function also exists on the trait. Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/pin-init/pull/56/commits/a424a6c9af5a4418a8e5e986a3db26a4432e2f1a Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250523145125.523275-3-lossin@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
2025-06-11rust: pin-init: rename `zeroed` to `init_zeroed`Benno Lossin-24/+24
The name `zeroed` is a much better fit for a function that returns the type by-value. Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/pin-init/pull/56/commits/7dbe38682c9725405bab91dcabe9c4d8893d2f5e [ also rename uses in `rust/kernel/init.rs` - Benno] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250523145125.523275-2-lossin@kernel.org [ Fix wrong replacement of `mem::zeroed` in the definition of `trait Zeroable`. - Benno ] [ Also change occurrences of `zeroed` in `configfs.rs` - Benno ] Acked-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
2025-06-11rust: pin-init: feature-gate the `stack_init_reuse` test on the `std` featureBenno Lossin-0/+1
When trying to run `cargo check --all-targets --no-default-features`, an error is reported by the test, as it cannot find the `std` crate. This is to be expected, since the `--no-default-features` flag enables the `no-std` behavior of the crate. Thus exclude the test in that scenario. Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/pin-init/pull/50/commits/2813729ccacdedee9dbfcab1ed285b8721a0391b Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250523125424.192843-4-lossin@kernel.org [ Changed my author email address to @kernel.org. - Benno ] Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
2025-06-11rust: pin-init: examples: pthread_mutex: disable the main test for miriBenno Lossin-1/+1
`miri` takes a long time to execute the test, so disable it. Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/pin-init/pull/50/commits/e717a9eec85024c11e79e8bd9dcb664ad0de8f94 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250523125424.192843-3-lossin@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
2025-06-11rust: pin-init: examples, tests: add conditional compilation in order to ↵Benno Lossin-90/+121
compile under any feature combination In the CI, all examples & tests should be run under all feature combinations. Currently several examples & tests use `std` without conditionally enabling it. Thus make them all compile under any feature combination by conditionally disabling the code that uses e.g. `std`. Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/pin-init/pull/50/commits/fdfb70efddbc711b4543c850ee38a2f5a8d17cb6 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250523125424.192843-2-lossin@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
2025-06-11rust: pin-init: change blanket impls for `[Pin]Init` and add one for ↵Benno Lossin-4/+26
`Result<T, E>` Remove the error from the blanket implementations `impl<T, E> Init<T, E> for T` (and also for `PinInit`). Add implementations for `Result<T, E>`. This allows one to easily construct (un)conditional failing initializers. It also improves the compatibility with APIs that do not use pin-init, because users can supply a `Result<T, E>` to a function taking an `impl PinInit<T, E>`. Suggested-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/pin-init/pull/62/commits/58612514b256c6f4a4a0718be25298410e67387a [ Also fix a compile error in block. - Benno ] Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250529081027.297648-2-lossin@kernel.org [ Add title prefix `rust: pin-init`. - Benno ] Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
2025-06-11rust: pin-init: improve safety documentation for `impl<T> [Pin]Init<T> for T`Benno Lossin-5/+7
The inner SAFETY comments were missing since commit 5cfe7bef6751 ("rust: enable `clippy::undocumented_unsafe_blocks` lint"). Also rework the implementation of `__pinned_init` to better justify the SAFETY comment. Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/pin-init/pull/62/commits/df925b2e27d499b7144df7e62b01acb00d4b94b8 Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250529081027.297648-1-lossin@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
2025-05-18Merge tag 'pin-init-v6.16' of https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux into ↵Miguel Ojeda-10/+279
rust-next Pull pin-init updates from Benno Lossin: "Added: - 'Wrapper<T>' trait for creating pin-initializers for wrapper structs with a structurally pinned value such as 'UnsafeCell<T>' or 'MaybeUninit<T>'. - 'MaybeZeroable' derive macro to try to derive 'Zeroable', but not error if not all fields implement it. This is needed to derive 'Zeroable' for all bindgen-generated structs. - 'unsafe fn cast_[pin_]init()' functions to unsafely change the initialized type of an initializer. These are utilized by the 'Wrapper<T>' implementations. Changed: - Added support for visibility in 'Zeroable' derive macro. - Added support for 'union's in 'Zeroable' derive macro. Upstream dev news: - The CI has been streamlined & some bugs with it have been fixed. I also added new workflows to check if the user-space version and the one in the kernel tree have diverged. - I also started to use the issues [1] tab to keep track of any problems or unexpected/unwanted things. This should help folks report and diagnose issues w.r.t. 'pin-init' better. [1] https://github.com/rust-for-linux/pin-init/issues" * tag 'pin-init-v6.16' of https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux: rust: pin-init: improve documentation for `Zeroable` derive macros rust: pin-init: fix typos rust: pin-init: add `MaybeZeroable` derive macro rust: pin-init: allow `Zeroable` derive macro to also be applied to unions rust: pin-init: allow `pub` fields in `derive(Zeroable)` rust: pin-init: Update the structural pinning link in readme. rust: pin-init: Update Changelog and Readme rust: pin-init: Implement `Wrapper` for `UnsafePinned` behind feature flag. rust: pin-init: Add the `Wrapper` trait. rust: pin-init: add `cast_[pin_]init` functions to change the initialized type rust: pin-init: examples: use `allow` instead of `expect` rust: pin-init: examples: conditionally enable `feature(lint_reasons)` rust: pin-init: internal: skip rustfmt formatting of kernel-only module rust: pin-init: synchronize README.md
2025-05-07rust: clean Rust 1.88.0's `clippy::uninlined_format_args` lintMiguel Ojeda-2/+1
Starting with Rust 1.88.0 (expected 2025-06-26) [1], `rustc` may move back the `uninlined_format_args` to `style` from `pedantic` (it was there waiting for rust-analyzer suppotr), and thus we will start to see lints like: warning: variables can be used directly in the `format!` string --> rust/macros/kunit.rs:105:37 | 105 | let kunit_wrapper_fn_name = format!("kunit_rust_wrapper_{}", test); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | = help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#uninlined_format_args help: change this to | 105 - let kunit_wrapper_fn_name = format!("kunit_rust_wrapper_{}", test); 105 + let kunit_wrapper_fn_name = format!("kunit_rust_wrapper_{test}"); There is even a case that is a pure removal: warning: variables can be used directly in the `format!` string --> rust/macros/module.rs:51:13 | 51 | format!("{field}={content}\0", field = field, content = content) | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | = help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#uninlined_format_args help: change this to | 51 - format!("{field}={content}\0", field = field, content = content) 51 + format!("{field}={content}\0") The lints all seem like nice cleanups, thus just apply them. We may want to disable `allow-mixed-uninlined-format-args` in the future. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # Needed in 6.12.y and later (Rust is pinned in older LTSs). Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/14160 [1] Acked-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250502140237.1659624-6-ojeda@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2025-05-01rust: pin-init: improve documentation for `Zeroable` derive macrosBenno Lossin-6/+18
Specify that both `MaybeZeroable` and `Zeroable` work on `union`s. Add a doc example for a union. Also include an example with visibility on the field. Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/pin-init/pull/48/commits/ab0985a0e08df06c60a32ca5888f74adcc2c1cf3 Reviewed-by: Christian Schrefl <chrisi.schrefl@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
2025-05-01rust: pin-init: fix typosBenno Lossin-1/+1
Correct two typos in the `Wrapper::pin_init` documentation. Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/pin-init/pull/48/commits/fd0bf5e244b685188dc642fc4a0bd3f042468fdb Reviewed-by: Christian Schrefl <chrisi.schrefl@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
2025-05-01rust: pin-init: add `MaybeZeroable` derive macroBenno Lossin-1/+120
This derive macro implements `Zeroable` for structs & unions precisely if all fields also implement `Zeroable` and does nothing otherwise. The plain `Zeroable` derive macro instead errors when it cannot derive `Zeroable` safely. The `MaybeZeroable` derive macro is useful in cases where manual checking is infeasible such as with the bindings crate. Move the zeroable generics parsing into a standalone function in order to avoid code duplication between the two derive macros. Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/pin-init/pull/42/commits/1165cdad1a391b923efaf30cf76bc61e38da022e Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
2025-05-01rust: pin-init: allow `Zeroable` derive macro to also be applied to unionsBenno Lossin-0/+30
Enabling the same behavior for unions as for structs is correct, but could be relaxed: the valid bit patterns for unions are the union of all valid bit patterns of their fields. So for a union to implement `Zeroable`, only a single field needs to implement `Zeroable`. This can be a future improvement, as it is currently only needed for unions where all fields implement `Zeroable`. There is no danger for mis-parsing with the two optional tokens (ie neither one or both tokens are parsed), as the compiler will already have rejected that before giving it as the input to the derive macro. Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/pin-init/pull/42/commits/5927b497ce522d82f6c082d5ba9235df57bfdb32 Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
2025-05-01rust: pin-init: allow `pub` fields in `derive(Zeroable)`Benno Lossin-1/+1
Add support for parsing `pub`, `pub(crate)` and `pub(super)` to the derive macro `Zeroable`. Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/pin-init/pull/42/commits/e8311e52ca57273e7ed6d099144384971677a0ba Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
2025-05-01rust: pin-init: Update the structural pinning link in readme.Christian Schrefl-2/+2
The previous link anchor was broken in rust 1.77, because the documentation was refactored in upstream rust. Change the link to refer to the new section in the rust documentation. Signed-off-by: Christian Schrefl <chrisi.schrefl@gmail.com> Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/pin-init/pull/37/commits/a146142fe18cafa52f8c6da306ca2729d789cfbf [ Fixed commit authorship. - Benno ] Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
2025-05-01rust: pin-init: Update Changelog and ReadmeChristian Schrefl-0/+12
Add Changelog entry for the `Wrapper` trait and document the `unsafe-pinned` feature in the Readme. Signed-off-by: Christian Schrefl <chrisi.schrefl@gmail.com> Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/pin-init/pull/37/commits/986555f564645efb238e8092c6314388c859efe5 [ Fixed commit authorship. - Benno ] Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
2025-05-01rust: pin-init: Implement `Wrapper` for `UnsafePinned` behind feature flag.Christian Schrefl-0/+12
Add the `unsafe-pinned` feature which gates the `Wrapper` implementation of the `core::pin::UnsafePinned` struct. For now this is just a cargo feature, but once `core::pin::UnsafePinned` is stable a config flag can be added to allow the usage of this implementation in the linux kernel. Signed-off-by: Christian Schrefl <chrisi.schrefl@gmail.com> Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/pin-init/pull/37/commits/99cb1934425357e780ea5b0628f66633123847b8 [ Fixed commit authorship. - Benno ] Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>