| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
When tests are executed via `test_expect_failure` we rather obviously
expect the test itself to fail. If it unexpectedly does not fail then we
count the test as a "fixed" test and announce that a known breakage has
vanished:
ok 1 - setup
ok 2 - create refs/heads/main # TODO known breakage vanished
ok 3 - create refs/heads/main with oldvalue verification
...
ok 299 - update-ref should also create reflog for HEAD
# 1 known breakage(s) vanished; please update test(s)
# passed all remaining 298 test(s)
1..299
While we announce that tests should be updated, the overall test suite
still passes. This makes it quite hard to detect when a test that has
previously failed succeeds now as the developer needs to pay close
attention to the exact output. Even more importantly, tests that only
succeed on _some_ systems are even easier to miss now, as one would have
to explicitly take a look at respective CI jobs to notice that those do
pass now.
Furthermore, we are about to introduce support for parsing TAP output in
Meson. In contrast to prove(1), which treats unexpected passes as a
successful test run, Meson treats those as failure. Neither of these
tools is wrong in doing so. Quoting the TAP specification [1]:
Should a todo test point begin succeeding, the harness may report it
in some way that indicates that whatever was supposed to be done has
been, and it should be promoted to a normal Test Point.
So it is essentially implementation-defined how exactly the unexpected
pass is reported, and whether it should cause the overall test suite to
fail or not. It is unarguably a bad thing for us though if these tools
interpret these differently, as it would mean that test results now
depend on whether the developer uses prove(1) or Meson.
Unify the behaviour by causing a test suite to fail when there are any
unexpected passes. As prove(1) does not consider an unexpected pass to
be an error this leads to somewhat funky output:
t1400-update-ref.sh ................................ Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
All 299 subtests passed
(1 TODO test unexpectedly succeeded)
...
Test Summary Report
-------------------
t1400-update-ref.sh (Wstat: 256 (exited 1) Tests: 299 Failed: 0)
TODO passed: 2
Non-zero exit status: 1
But as we directly announce that the root cause is an unexpected TODO
that has succeeded it's not all that bad.
[1]: https://testanything.org/tap-version-14-specification.html
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
We have several flags like "--verbose", "--verbose-only" or "-x" that
cause us to generate shell traces. The generated tracing output is split
up in these cases so that the test's stdout is printed to file
descriptor 3 whereas its stderr is printed to file descriptor 4.
Depending on which options have been given, we then end up either:
- Redirecting both file descriptors to a file.
- Redirecting them to stdout and stderr, respectively.
- Closing them in case we're running in none-verbose mode.
The second case causes problems though when passing output to a TAP
parser. We print the test's stdout to the console's stdout, and that
results in broken TAP output.
Fix the issue by instead redirecting the test's stdout to the shell's
stderr. This makes it impossible to discern stdout from stderr, but
going by my own experience I never came across a usecase where I would
have needed this distinction.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Fix typos in documentation, comments, etc.
Via codespell.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Kreimer <algonell@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
|
|
* maint-2.41: (38 commits)
Git 2.41.1
Git 2.40.2
Git 2.39.4
fsck: warn about symlink pointing inside a gitdir
core.hooksPath: add some protection while cloning
init.templateDir: consider this config setting protected
clone: prevent hooks from running during a clone
Add a helper function to compare file contents
init: refactor the template directory discovery into its own function
find_hook(): refactor the `STRIP_EXTENSION` logic
clone: when symbolic links collide with directories, keep the latter
entry: report more colliding paths
t5510: verify that D/F confusion cannot lead to an RCE
submodule: require the submodule path to contain directories only
clone_submodule: avoid using `access()` on directories
submodules: submodule paths must not contain symlinks
clone: prevent clashing git dirs when cloning submodule in parallel
t7423: add tests for symlinked submodule directories
has_dir_name(): do not get confused by characters < '/'
docs: document security issues around untrusted .git dirs
...
|
|
* maint-2.39: (38 commits)
Git 2.39.4
fsck: warn about symlink pointing inside a gitdir
core.hooksPath: add some protection while cloning
init.templateDir: consider this config setting protected
clone: prevent hooks from running during a clone
Add a helper function to compare file contents
init: refactor the template directory discovery into its own function
find_hook(): refactor the `STRIP_EXTENSION` logic
clone: when symbolic links collide with directories, keep the latter
entry: report more colliding paths
t5510: verify that D/F confusion cannot lead to an RCE
submodule: require the submodule path to contain directories only
clone_submodule: avoid using `access()` on directories
submodules: submodule paths must not contain symlinks
clone: prevent clashing git dirs when cloning submodule in parallel
t7423: add tests for symlinked submodule directories
has_dir_name(): do not get confused by characters < '/'
docs: document security issues around untrusted .git dirs
upload-pack: disable lazy-fetching by default
fetch/clone: detect dubious ownership of local repositories
...
|
|
There is a bug in directory/file ("D/F") conflict checking optimization:
It assumes that such a conflict cannot happen if a newly added entry's
path is lexicgraphically "greater than" the last already-existing index
entry _and_ contains a directory separator that comes strictly after the
common prefix (`len > len_eq_offset`).
This assumption is incorrect, though: `a-` sorts _between_ `a` and
`a/b`, their common prefix is `a`, the slash comes after the common
prefix, and there is still a file/directory conflict.
Let's re-design this logic, taking these facts into consideration:
- It is impossible for a file to sort after another file with whose
directory it conflicts because the trailing NUL byte is always smaller
than any other character.
- Since there are quite a number of ASCII characters that sort before
the slash (e.g. `-`, `.`, the space character), looking at the last
already-existing index entry is not enough to determine whether there
is a D/F conflict when the first character different from the
existing last index entry's path is a slash.
If it is not a slash, there cannot be a file/directory conflict.
And if the existing index entry's first different character is a
slash, it also cannot be a file/directory conflict because the
optimization requires the newly-added entry's path to sort _after_ the
existing entry's, and the conflicting file's path would not.
So let's fall back to the regular binary search whenever the newly-added
item's path differs in a slash character. If it does not, and it sorts
after the last index entry, there is no D/F conflict and the new index
entry can be safely appended.
This fix also nicely simplifies the logic and makes it much easier to
reason about, while the impact on performance should be negligible:
After this fix, the optimization will be skipped only when index
entry's paths differ in a slash and a space, `!`, `"`, `#`, `$`,
`%`, `&`, `'`, | ( `)`, `*`, `+`, `,`, `-`, or `.`, which should
be a rare situation.
Signed-off-by: Filip Hejsek <filip.hejsek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
|
|
Some tests in t0000-basic.sh used the older four space indent format.
Update these to use tabs.
Signed-off-by: John Cai <johncai86@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Unlike other test helper functions, 'test_oid' doesn't terminate its
output with a LF, but, alas, the reason for this, if any, is not
mentioned in 2c02b110da (t: add test functions to translate
hash-related values, 2018-09-13)).
Now, in the vast majority of cases 'test_oid' is invoked in a command
substitution that is part of a heredoc or supplies an argument to a
command or the value to a variable, and the command substitution would
chop off any trailing LFs, so in these cases the lack or presence of a
trailing LF in its output doesn't matter. However:
- There appear to be only three cases where 'test_oid' is not
invoked in a command substitution:
$ git grep '\stest_oid ' -- ':/t/*.sh'
t0000-basic.sh: test_oid zero >actual &&
t0000-basic.sh: test_oid zero >actual &&
t0000-basic.sh: test_oid zero >actual &&
These are all in test cases checking that 'test_oid' actually
works, and that the size of its output matches the size of the
corresponding hash function with conditions like
test $(wc -c <actual) -eq 40
In these cases the lack of trailing LF does actually matter,
though they could be trivially updated to account for the presence
of a trailing LF.
- There are also a few cases where the lack of trailing LF in
'test_oid's output actually hurts, because tests need to compare
its output with LF terminated file contents, forcing developers to
invoke it as 'echo $(test_oid ...)' to append the missing LF:
$ git grep 'echo "\?$(test_oid ' -- ':/t/*.sh'
t1302-repo-version.sh: echo $(test_oid version) >expect &&
t1500-rev-parse.sh: echo "$(test_oid algo)" >expect &&
t4044-diff-index-unique-abbrev.sh: echo "$(test_oid val1)" > foo &&
t4044-diff-index-unique-abbrev.sh: echo "$(test_oid val2)" > foo &&
t5313-pack-bounds-checks.sh: echo $(test_oid oidfff) >file &&
And there is yet another similar case in an in-flight topic at:
https://public-inbox.org/git/813e81a058227bd373cec802e443fcd677042fb4.1670862677.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com/
Arguably we would be better off if 'test_oid' terminated its output
with a LF. So let's update 'test_oid' accordingly, update its tests
in t0000 to account for the extra character in those size tests, and
remove the now unnecessary 'echo $(...)' command substitutions around
'test_oid' invocations as well.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Add the ability to have those tests that fail return 0, and those
tests that succeed return 1. This is useful e.g. to run "--stress"
tests on tests that fail 99% of the time on some setup, i.e. to smoke
out the flaky run which yielded success.
In a subsequent commit a new SANITIZE=leak mode will make use of this.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Change the "--immediate" option so that it emits valid TAP on
failure. Before this it would omit the required plan at the end,
e.g. under SANITIZE=leak we'd show a "No plan found in TAP output"
error from "prove":
$ prove t0006-date.sh :: --immediate
t0006-date.sh .. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 1/22 subtests
Test Summary Report
-------------------
t0006-date.sh (Wstat: 256 Tests: 22 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 22
Non-zero exit status: 1
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
Files=1, Tests=22, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.18 cusr 0.06 csys = 0.27 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Now we'll emit output that doesn't result in TAP parsing failures:
$ prove t0006-date.sh :: --immediate
t0006-date.sh .. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 1/22 subtests
Test Summary Report
-------------------
t0006-date.sh (Wstat: 256 Tests: 22 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 22
Non-zero exit status: 1
Files=1, Tests=22, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.19 cusr 0.05 csys = 0.26 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Pipes ignore error codes of LHS command and thus we should not use
them with Git in tests. As an alternative, use a 'tmp' file to write
the Git output so we can test the exit code.
Signed-off-by: Shubham Mishra <shivam828787@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Updates to the tests in t0000 to test the test framework.
* ab/lib-subtest:
test-lib tests: get rid of copy/pasted mock test code
test-lib tests: assert 1 exit code, not non-zero
test-lib tests: refactor common part of check_sub_test_lib_test*()
test-lib tests: avoid subshell for "test_cmp" for readability
test-lib tests: don't provide a description for the sub-tests
test-lib tests: split up "write and run" into two functions
test-lib tests: move "run_sub_test" to a new lib-subtest.sh
|
|
Now that we've split up the write_sub_test_lib_test*() and
run_sub_test_lib_test*() functions let's fix those tests in
t0000-basic.sh that were verbosely copy/pasting earlier tests.
That we caught all of them was asserted with a follow-up change that's
not part of this series[1], we might add such a duplication check at
some later time, but for now let's just one-off remove the duplicate
boilerplate.
1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/patch-v3-6.9-bc79b29f3c-20210805T103237Z-avarab@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Change the $test_description provided for the generated subtests to be
constant, since the only purpose of having it is that test-lib.sh will
barf if it isn't supplied.
The other purpose of having it was to effectively split up the test
description between the argument to test_expect_success and the
argument to "write_and_run_sub_test_lib_test". Let's only use one of
the two.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Refactor the function to write and run tests of the test-lib.sh output
into two functions.
When this was added back in 565b6fa87bb (tests: refactor mechanics of
testing in a sub test-lib, 2012-12-16) there was no reason to do this,
but since we started supporting test arguments in
517cd55fd51 (test-lib: self-test that --verbose works, 2013-06-23)
we've started to write out duplicate tests simply to test different
arguments, now we'll be able to re-use them.
This change doesn't consolidate any of those tests yet, it just makes
it possible to do so. All the changes in t0000-basic.sh are a simple
search-replacement.
Since the _run_sub_test_lib_test_common() function doesn't handle
running the test anymore we can do away with the sub-shell, which was
used to scope an "unset" and "export" shell variables.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
9af0b8dbe2 (t0000-basic: more commit-tree tests., 2006-04-26) adds
tests for commit-tree that mask the return exit from git as described
in a378fee5b07 (Documentation: add shell guidelines, 2018-10-05).
Fix the tests, to avoid pipes by using a temporary file instead.
Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <carenas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Move the "check_sub_test_lib_test()" and its sister functions to a new
lib-subtest.sh.
In the future (not in this series) I'd like to test test-lib's output
in a more targeted and smaller test, and I'll need these functions to
do that.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Testcases in t0000 are quite special given that they many of them run
nested testcases to verify that testing functionality itself works as
expected. These nested testcases are realized by writing a new ad-hoc
test script which again sources test-lib.sh, where the new script is
created in a nested subdirectory located beneath the current trash
directory. We then execute the new test script with the nested
subdirectory as current working directory and explicitly re-export
TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY to point to that directory.
While this works as expected in the general case, it falls apart when
the developer has TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY explicitly defined either via
the environment or via config.mak and runs "make test". In that case,
test-lib.sh will clobber the value that we've just carefully set up to
instead contain what the developer has defined. As a result, the
TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY continues to point at the root output directory,
not at the nested one.
This issue causes breakage in the 'test_atexit is run' test case: the
nested test case writes files into "../../", which is assumed to be the
parent's trash directory. But because TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY already
points to to the root output directory, we instead end up writing those
files outside of the output directory. The parent test case will then
try to check whether those files still exist in its own trash directory,
which thus must fail now.
Fix the issue by adding a new TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY_OVERRIDE variable.
If set, then we'll always override the TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY with its
value after sourcing GIT-BUILD-OPTIONS.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
In t0000, we run several fake "sub-test" suites to verify the behavior
of the test suite. But because we don't clear the parent environment
completely, the sub-tests can be fooled by variables meant for the
parent. For example:
GIT_SKIP_TESTS=t1234 ./t0000-basic.sh
fails when a sub-test expects its fake t1234 to actually run. This
particular pattern is unlikely in practice; we're running a single
script, and there is no t1234 in the real test suite anyway (not yet, at
least). A more real-world example is:
GIT_SKIP_TESTS=t[^0]* make test
to run only the t0* tests.
The fix is conceptually simple: we should clear the GIT_SKIP_TESTS
variable when running the sub-tests, because its contents (if any) will
be meant for the main test suite. This is easy to do centrally in our
sub-test helper.
But there's a catch: some of our tests do set GIT_SKIP_TESTS
intentionally to test the feature. We need to allow them to continue to
set it, but clear it for all the other tests. And the sub-test helper
can't tell if the GIT_SKIP_TESTS it sees is from a test or not. We can
handle this by adding a new option to the helper to let callers specify
the skip list.
I considered adding a more general "--eval" option to let callers set up
the env for the sub-test however they like. That would cover this case
and possible future ones. But the quoting gets awkward for the callers
(since we're now 2 layers deep in evals!), so I went with the simpler
more specific solution.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Stop setting the GIT_TEST_FRAMEWORK_SELFTEST variable. This was originally needed
back in 4231d1ba99 (t0000: do not get self-test disrupted by
environment warnings, 2018-09-20).
It hasn't been needed since I deleted the relevant code in test-lib.sh
in c0eedbc009 (test-lib: remove check_var_migration, 2021-02-09), I
just didn't notice that it was set here.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
As a follow-up to d162b25f956 (tests: remove support for
GIT_TEST_GETTEXT_POISON, 2021-01-20) remove those uses of the now
always true C_LOCALE_OUTPUT prerequisite from those tests which
declare it as an argument to test_expect_{success,failure}.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When we use the sub-test helpers, we end up defining one shell snippet
inside another shell snippet. So if we use single-quotes for the outer
snippet, we have to use double-quotes within the inner snippet (it's
included as here-doc within the outer snippet, but using a single quote
would end the outer snippet early). Or vice versa we can use double
quotes for the outer snippet, but then single quotes in the inner.
We have some of each in the script, and neither is wrong. But it would
be nice to be consistent unless there is a good reason not to. Using
single quotes for the outer script is preferable, because it requires
less metacharacter quoting overall. For example, in:
test_expect_success 'outer' '
run_sub_test_lib_test ... <<-\EOF
echo $foo &&
test_expect_success "inner" "
echo \$bar
"
EOF
'
we need only quote inside "inner", but not inside "outer" or the
here-doc. Whereas if we flip them, we have to quote in both places:
test_expect_success 'outer' "
run_sub_test_lib_test ... <<-\EOF
echo \$foo &&
test_expect_success 'inner' '
echo \$bar
'
EOF
"
The exception is when we need a literal single-quote in an expected
output here-doc. There we can either use outer double-quotes, or just
use ${SQ} within the doc. I chose the latter for consistency (within
this test, but also with other test scripts that face the same problem).
There is one other interesting case, which is some tests that do:
test_expect_success ... "
do_something --run='"'!3'"'
"
This is rather confusing to read, but is correct. The outer script sees
'!3' in single-quotes, as does the eval'd snippet. This is perhaps being
overly cautious. In many interactive shells, an exclamation triggers
history expansion even inside double quotes, but that is not generally
true in non-interactive shells.
There's some conflicting information here. Commit 784ce03d55 (t4216:
avoid unnecessary subshell in test_bloom_filters_not_used, 2020-05-19)
reports it as a problem with OpenBSD 6.7's /bin/sh. However, we have
many instances in this script of prereqs like !LAZY_TRUE, which haven't
been a problem. I left them un-escaped here to test out this theory.
It's much nicer if we can not worry about this as a portability issue,
so it's worth knowing.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Our check of test_when_finished is done directly in the main script, and
if we failed to clean, we complain and exit immediately. It's nicer to
signal a test failure here, for a few reasons:
- this gives better output to the user when run under a TAP harness
like "prove"
- constency; it's the only test left in the file that behaves this way
- half of its "if" conditional is nonsense anyway; it picked up a
reference to GIT_TEST_FAIL_PREREQS_INTERNAL in dfe1a17df9 (tests:
add a special setup where prerequisites fail, 2019-05-13) along with
its neighbors, even though it has nothing to do with that flag
We could actually do this without a sub-test at all, and just put our
two tests (one to do cleanup, and one to check that it happened) in the
main script. But doing it in a subtest is conceptually cleaner (from the
perspective of the main test script, we are checking only one thing),
and it remains consistent with the "cleanup when failing" test directly
after it, which has to happen in a sub-test (to avoid the main script
complaining of the failed test).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
We test the behavior of prerequisites in t0000 by setting up fake ones
in the main test script, trying to run some tests, and then seeing if
those tests impacted the environment correctly. If they didn't, then we
write a message and manually call exit.
Instead, let's push these down into a sub-test, like many of the other
tests covering the framework itself. This has a few advantages:
- it does not pollute the test output with mention of skipped tests
(that we know are uninteresting -- the point of the test was to see
that these are skipped).
- when running in a TAP harness, we get a useful test failure message
(whereas when the script exits early, a tool like "prove" simply
says "Dubious, test returned 1").
- we do not have to worry about different test environments, such as
when GIT_TEST_FAIL_PREREQS_INTERNAL is set. Our sub-test helpers
already give us a known environment.
- the tests themselves are a bit easier to read, as we can just check
the test-framework output to see what happened (and get the usual
test_cmp diff if it failed)
A few notes on the implementation:
- we could do one sub-test per each individual test_expect_success. I
broke it up here into a few logical groups, as I think this makes it
more readable
- the original tests modified environment variables inside the test
bodies. Instead, I've used "true" as the body of a test we expect to
run and "false" otherwise. Technically this does not confirm that
the body of the "true" test actually ran. We are trusting the
framework output to believe that it truly ran, which is sufficient
for these tests. And I think the end result is much simpler to
follow.
- the nested_prereq test uses a few bare "test -f" calls; I converted
these to our usual test_path_is_* helpers while moving the code
around.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
We check that test_when_finished cleans up after a test, and that it
runs even after a failure. Those two were originally adjacent, but got
split apart by the new test added in 477dcaddb6 (tests: do not let lazy
prereqs inside `test_expect_*` turn off tracing, 2020-03-26), and then
further by more lazy-prereq tests. Let's move them back together.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
A lazily defined test prerequisite can now be defined in terms of
another lazily defined test prerequisite.
* sg/tests-prereq:
tests: fix description of 'test_set_prereq'
tests: make sure nested lazy prereqs work reliably
|
|
Some test prereqs depend on other prereqs, so in a couple of cases we
have nested prereqs that look something like this:
test_lazy_prereq FOO '
test_have_prereq BAR &&
check-foo
'
This can be problematic, because lazy prereqs are evaluated in the
'$TRASH_DIRECTORY/prereq-test-dir' directory, which is the same for
every prereq, and which is automatically removed after the prereq has
been evaluated. So if the inner prereq (BAR above) is a lazy prereq
that hasn't been evaluated yet, then after its evaluation the
'prereq-test-dir' shared with the outer prereq will be removed.
Consequently, 'check-foo' will find itself in a non-existing
directory, and won't be able to create/access any files in its cwd,
which could result in an unfulfilled outer prereq.
Luckily, this doesn't affect any of our current nested prereqs, either
because the inner prereq is not a lazy prereq (e.g. MINGW, CYGWIN or
PERL), or because the outer prereq happens to be checked without
touching any paths in its cwd (GPGSM and RFC1991 in 'lib-gpg.sh').
So to prevent nested prereqs from interfering with each other let's
evaluate each prereq in its own dedicated directory by appending the
prereq's name to the directory name, e.g. 'prereq-test-dir-SYMLINKS'.
In the test we check not only that the prereq test dir is still there,
but also that the inner prereq can't mess with the outer prereq's
files.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Our test scripts can be told to run only individual pieces while
skipping others with the "--run=..." option; they were taught to
take a substring of test title, in addition to numbers, to name the
test pieces to run.
* en/test-selector:
test-lib: reduce verbosity of skipped tests
t6006, t6012: adjust tests to use 'setup' instead of synonyms
test-lib: allow selecting tests by substring/glob with --run
|
|
Many of our test scripts have several "setup" tests. It's a lot easier
to say
./t0050-filesystem.sh --run=setup,9
in order to run all the setup tests as well as test #9, than it is to
track down what all the setup tests are and enter all their numbers in
the list. Also, I often find myself wanting to run just one or a couple
tests from the test file, but I don't know the numbering of any of the
tests -- to get it I either have to first run the whole test file (or
start counting by hand or figure out some other clever but non-obvious
tricks). It's really convenient to be able to just look at the test
description(s) and then run
./t6416-recursive-corner-cases.sh --run=symlink
or
./t6402-merge-rename.sh --run='setup,unnecessary update'
Add such an ability to test selection which relies on merely matching
against the test description.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Caleb Tillman <caleb.tillman@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The final leg of SHA-256 transition.
* bc/sha-256-part-3: (39 commits)
t: remove test_oid_init in tests
docs: add documentation for extensions.objectFormat
ci: run tests with SHA-256
t: make SHA1 prerequisite depend on default hash
t: allow testing different hash algorithms via environment
t: add test_oid option to select hash algorithm
repository: enable SHA-256 support by default
setup: add support for reading extensions.objectformat
bundle: add new version for use with SHA-256
builtin/verify-pack: implement an --object-format option
http-fetch: set up git directory before parsing pack hashes
t0410: mark test with SHA1 prerequisite
t5308: make test work with SHA-256
t9700: make hash size independent
t9500: ensure that algorithm info is preserved in config
t9350: make hash size independent
t9301: make hash size independent
t9300: use $ZERO_OID instead of hard-coded object ID
t9300: abstract away SHA-1-specific constants
t8011: make hash size independent
...
|
|
Now that we call test_oid_init in the setup for all test scripts,
there's no point in calling it individually. Remove all of the places
where we've done so to help keep tests tidy.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
In some tests, we have data files which are written with a particular
hash algorithm. Instead of keeping two copies of the test files, we can
keep one, and translate the value on the fly.
In order to do so, we'll need to read both the source algorithm and the
current algorithm, so add an optional flag to the test_oid helper that
lets us look up a value for a specified hash algorithm. This should
not cause any conflicts with existing tests, since key arguments to
test_oid are allowed to contains only shell identifier characters.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
In previous commits, we removed the usage of test_must_fail() for most
commands except for a set of pre-approved commands. Since that's done,
only allow test_must_fail() to run those pre-approved commands.
Obviously, we should allow `git`.
We allow `__git*` as some completion functions return an error code that
comes from a git invocation. It's good to avoid using test_must_fail
unnecessarily but it wouldn't hurt to err on the side of caution when
we're potentially wrapping a git command (like in these cases).
We also allow `test-tool` and `test-svn-fe` because these are helper
commands that are written by us and we want to catch their failure.
Finally, we allow `test_terminal` because `test_terminal` just wraps
around git commands. Also, we cannot rewrite
`test_must_fail test_terminal` as `test_terminal test_must_fail` because
test_must_fail() is a shell function and as a result, it cannot be
invoked from the test-terminal Perl script.
We opted to explicitly list the above tools instead of using a catch-all
such as `test[-_]*` because we want to be as restrictive as possible so
that in the future, someone would not accidentally introduce an
unrelated usage of test_must_fail() on an "unapproved" command.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The basic test did not honor $TEST_SHELL_PATH setting, which has
been corrected.
* cb/t0000-use-the-configured-shell:
t/t0000-basic: make sure subtests also use TEST_SHELL_PATH
|
|
3f824e91c8 (t/Makefile: introduce TEST_SHELL_PATH, 2017-12-08) allows for
setting a shell for running the tests, but the generated subtests weren't
updated.
Correct that and while at it update it to use write_script.
Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <carenas@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The test added by 477dcaddb6 (tests: do not let lazy prereqs inside
`test_expect_*` turn off tracing, 2020-03-26) runs a sub-test script
that traces a test with a lazy prereq, like:
test_have_prereq LAZY && echo trace
That won't work if GIT_TEST_FAIL_PREREQS is set in the environment,
because our have_prereq will report failure, and we won't run the echo
at all.
We could work around this by avoiding the &&-chain, but we can
fix this and any future tests at once by unsetting that variable for our
sub-tests. These are meant to be controlled environments where we test
the test-suite itself; the outer test snippet should be in charge of the
sub-test environment, not whatever mode the user happens to be running
in.
Reported-by: Son Luong Ngoc <sluongng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The `test_expect_*` functions use `test_eval_` and so does
`test_run_lazy_prereq_`. If tracing is enabled via the `-x` option,
`test_eval_` turns on tracing while evaluating the code block, and turns
it off directly after it.
This is unwanted for nested invocations.
One somewhat surprising example of this is when running a test that
calls `test_i18ngrep`: that function requires the `C_LOCALE_OUTPUT`
prereq, and that prereq is a lazy one, so it is evaluated via
`test_eval_`, the command tracing is turned off, and the test case
continues to run _without tracing the commands_.
Another somewhat surprising example is when one lazy prereq depends on
another lazy prereq: the former will call `test_have_prereq` with the
latter one, which in turn calls `test_eval_` and -- you guessed it --
tracing (if enabled) will be turned off _before_ returning to evaluating
the other lazy prereq.
As we will introduce just such a scenario with the GPG, GPGSM and
RFC1991 prereqs, let's fix that by introducing a variable that keeps
track of the current trace level: nested `test_eval_` calls will
increment and then decrement the level, and only when it reaches 0, the
tracing will _actually_ be turned off.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Test clean-up.
* dl/test-must-fail-fixes:
t1507: inline full_name()
t1507: run commands within test_expect_success
t1507: stop losing return codes of git commands
t1501: remove use of `test_might_fail cp`
t1409: use test_path_is_missing()
t1409: let sed open its own input file
t1307: reorder `nongit test_must_fail`
t1306: convert `test_might_fail rm` to `rm -f`
t0020: use ! check_packed_refs_marked
t0020: don't use `test_must_fail has_cr`
t0003: don't use `test_must_fail attr_check`
t0003: use test_must_be_empty()
t0003: use named parameters in attr_check()
t0000: replace test_must_fail with run_sub_test_lib_test_err()
t/lib-git-p4: use test_path_is_missing()
|
|
The test_must_fail function should only be used for git commands since
we should assume that external commands work sanely. We use
test_must_fail to test run_sub_test_lib_test() but that function does
not invoke any git commands internally. Even better, we have a function
that's exactly meant to be used when we expect to have a failing test
suite: run_sub_test_lib_test_err()!
Replace `test_must_fail run_sub_test_lib_test` with
`run_sub_test_lib_test_err`.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Recently we have declared that GIT_TEST_* variables take the
usual boolean values (it used to be that some used "non-empty
means true" and taking GIT_TEST_VAR=YesPlease as true); make
sure we notice and fail when non-bool strings are given to
these variables.
* sg/test-bool-env:
t5608-clone-2gb.sh: turn GIT_TEST_CLONE_2GB into a bool
tests: add 'test_bool_env' to catch non-bool GIT_TEST_* values
|
|
Test cleanup.
* dl/t5520-cleanup:
t5520: replace `! git` with `test_must_fail git`
t5520: remove redundant lines in test cases
t5520: replace $(cat ...) comparison with test_cmp
t5520: don't put git in upstream of pipe
t5520: test single-line files by git with test_cmp
t5520: use test_cmp_rev where possible
t5520: replace test -{n,z} with test-lib functions
t5520: use test_line_count where possible
t5520: remove spaces after redirect operator
t5520: replace test -f with test-lib functions
t5520: let sed open its own input
t5520: use sq for test case names
t5520: improve test style
t: teach test_cmp_rev to accept ! for not-equals
t0000: test multiple local assignment
|
|
Since 3b072c577b (tests: replace test_tristate with "git env--helper",
2019-06-21) we get the normalized bool values of various GIT_TEST_*
environment variables via 'git env--helper'. Now, while the 'git
env--helper' command itself does catch invalid values in the
environment variable or in the given --default and exits with error
(exit code 128 or 129, respectively), it's invoked in conditions like
'if ! git env--helper ...', which means that all invalid bool values
are interpreted the same as the ordinary 'false' (exit code 1). This
has led to inadvertently skipped httpd tests in our CI builds for a
couple of weeks, see 3960290675 (ci: restore running httpd tests,
2019-09-06).
Let's be more careful about what the test suite accepts as bool values
in GIT_TEST_* environment variables, and error out loud and clear on
invalid values instead of simply skipping tests. Add the
'test_bool_env' helper function to encapsulate the invocation of 'git
env--helper' and the verification of its exit code, and replace all
invocations of that command in our test framework and test suite with
a call to this new helper (except in 't0017-env-helper.sh', of
course).
$ GIT_TEST_GIT_DAEMON=YesPlease ./t5570-git-daemon.sh
fatal: bad numeric config value 'YesPlease' for 'GIT_TEST_GIT_DAEMON': invalid unit
error: test_bool_env requires bool values both for $GIT_TEST_GIT_DAEMON and for the default fallback
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
According to POSIX enhancement request '0000767: Add built-in
"local"'[1],
dash only allows one variable in a local definition; it permits
assignment though it doesn't document that clearly.
however, this isn't true since t0000 still passes with this patch
applied on dash 0.5.10.2. Needless to say, since `local` isn't POSIX
standardized, it is not exactly clear what `local` entails on different
versions of different shells.
We currently already have many instances of multiple local assignments
in our codebase. Ensure that this is actually supported by explicitly
testing that it is sane.
[1]: http://austingroupbugs.net/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=767
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Reported-by: Jens Schleusener <Jens.Schleusener@fossies.org>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
test update.
* dl/t0000-skip-test-test:
t0000: cover GIT_SKIP_TESTS blindspots
|
|
Currently, the tests for GIT_SKIP_TESTS do not cover the situation where
we skip an entire test suite. The tests also do not cover the situation
where we have GIT_SKIP_TESTS defined but the test suite does not match.
Add two test cases so we cover this blindspot.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The first line of verbose output from each test piece now carries
the test name and number to help scanning with eyeballs.
* sg/show-failed-test-names:
tests: show the test name and number at the start of verbose output
t0000-basic: use realistic test script names in the verbose tests
|
|
Test fix.
* bc/hash-independent-tests-part-4:
t0000: reword comments for "local" test
t: decrease nesting in test_oid_to_path
|
|
Commit 01d3a526ad (t0000: check whether the shell supports the "local"
keyword, 2017-10-26) added a test to gather data on whether people run
the test suite with shells that don't support "local".
After almost two years, nobody has complained, and several other uses
have cropped up in test-lib-functions.sh. Let's declare it acceptable to
use.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
